pauliesbowl
Registered User
- Messages
- 36
I would like to draw attention to Dolores's myth that masks reduce IQs in developing brains - we know brains need oxygen and we know masks restrict oxygen so why is it a myth that wearing one for a number of hours a day will hamper the development of the brain?
We're so long into the Covid journey at this point, how are you still falling for the long-disproven myths?and we know masks restrict oxygen
I have tried that experiment and after a few hours my oxygen levels are down by about 6%.
Not that I don't believe you but 6% drop in blood oxygen levels would be close to hospitalisation. There are also multiple published trials showing blood oxygen levels don't drop. So if you hadn't passed out, I'd suggest you check the equipment.
The myth is nonsense - the level of oxygen depravation on developing brains needs to be significant - and during developmental times for the brain. A mask on an adolescent / adult doesn't meet either criteria. If you wanted to support this myth you would have to explain away the many professions where mask wearing is standard with no effect. Or explain how masks reduce oxygen levels more than high altitude living - say Mexico. The proposition would need to be that masks reduce oxygen levels to the point where people would actually pass out.
Ok great so we're in agreement at least that masks do in fact reduce the ability to breathe but you reckon that it's not enough to matter, could you point me to your source on that?
I like that you identified that this would need to happen during the developmental stage of the brain as that's what Dolores was referring to so we know we're over the target in some sense I suppose and most certainly not in crackpot territory.. So weird that people refer to her as a nut-job when she seems like such a logical thinker, I mean we're talking about a tenured professor here with decades in the field making logical arguments and people are losing their minds - what is going on? It's hardly people with some sort of an agenda telling gullible people how to think is it? And then those gullible people basically forming mobs and bullying dissenters? Surely it couldn't be that? I mean I know the vax manufacturers are making ridiculous profits off this whole thing but that's surely just a coincidence and it's not like there's any precedent for them engaging in shady business practices, right?
Yeah, with the heat build up and condensation forming in the mask, it can get a little itchy or cause mild irritation to the skin. So it is a little less comfortable. Of course that does not in any way suggest any oxygen depravation.the WHO confirms that masks "may reduce the ability to breath comfortably"
Yes, you're right. This is all a massive global conspiracy of at least hundreds of thousands of medical professionals all in on the faking of multiple studies all so a small few people in the pharma companies can earn a bigger bonus!What is going on? It's hardly people with some sort of an agenda telling gullible people how to think is it? And then those gullible people basically forming mobs and bullying dissenters? Surely it couldn't be that?
Oh I'm sorry my mistake, I thought that because you said that the level of oxygen deprivation would have to be significant that you were conceding that deprivation was in fact occurring but just not at a significant enough level to cause harm.I think you misunderstand me - I don't agree that masks reduce the ability to breath normally. Yes I do think it is crackpot territory. I think she is a crack pot - someone who has in the past been logical but then lost the plot somewhere. Remember - GO'D at one point was a decent investigative journalist but went off the rails. Similar issue here. Her own students rebutted her claims if I recall.
I was quoting your post on the developmental question. I'm not going to go around digging out sources - just as I'm not going to dig sources to validate the earth is round. Feel free to do a simple google search. This is an extraordinary claim which is counter to what has been going on for years with no issues; the extra-ordinary claim requires the sourcing - not the denial
What is the p value of that study, and did you use a control group?I have tried that experiment and after a few hours my oxygen levels are down by about 6%.
Eh hundreds of thousands of medical professionals all in on it is literally the finding of all the cases, that's how kick backs work.Yeah, with the heat build up and condensation forming in the mask, it can get a little itchy or cause mild irritation to the skin. So it is a little less comfortable. Of course that does not in any way suggest any oxygen depravation.
Yes, you're right. This is all a massive global conspiracy of at least hundreds of thousands of medical professionals all in on the faking of multiple studies all so a small few people in the pharma companies can earn a bigger bonus!
Do you not think it odd that the WHO can't spell 'breathe'?I have tried that experiment and after a few hours my oxygen levels are down by about 6%.
All you have to do is look at clubman's link from the HSE where in the third point the WHO confirms that masks "may reduce the ability to breath comfortably" which btw directly contradicts the second point which claims that "wearing a mask has no effect on exercise performance".
Tbf I shouldn't even be referring to that link as it's nonsensically contradicting itself all over the place. This isn't complicated though - putting a cloth over your mouth will most certainly affect your ability to breath unless the mesh size is considerable, which it isn't.
You just did it. Must be the nano-mind chip.Waiting for the first mention of Bill Gates
When you say GO'D went off the rails you mean in your opinion yes? You're kinda presenting it as fact.
Look don't be silly, the fact that Bill Gates is the second largest donor to the WHO after the US is coincidental at best but to then try and link that fact to the fact that the WHO is controlling the pandemic is simply conspiracy nonsense.Waiting for the first mention of Bill Gates
She won her claim re Denis O'Brien no?I'm "kinda" supported by any court she has brought her claims to. I'm too busy to provide sources for a GO'D supporter
She won her claim re Denis O'Brien no?
Eh you claimed her losing court cases was proof she went off the rails and I referred to her not losing a case and you're attempting to frame that as changing the subject? And this coming from someone who brought GO'D into the discussion as a way of avoiding the provision of sources for their assertions ? I'm confused.The discussion is specifically about Coronavirus and related topics - this is the usual tactic of the conspiracy types; when presented with facts change the topic and try to divert to something else
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?