This is just another one of these crazy schemes like now having the bottle caps attached to the bottle so that it's ensured it gets also "recycled".
If you don't want your cap attached just pull it off. What's the issue?
This is just another one of these crazy schemes like now having the bottle caps attached to the bottle so that it's ensured it gets also "recycled".
What alternative do you propose given the previous system of hoping people would put them in a recycling bin was failing?
If you don't want your cap attached just pull it off. What's the issue?
Was it really failing?What alternative do you propose given the previous system of hoping people would put them in a recycling bin was failing?
A long way off target, getting worse, and leading us towards heavy fines? That's not definition of success.Was it really failing?
I seriously don't think it was, tbh.
Scotland was apparently in the same dire straits when the SNP/Green coalition proposed their own version of this scheme but the problem seemed to go away as soon as they were forced to abandon it.A long way off target, getting worse, and leading us towards heavy fines? That's not definition of success.
I haven't seen any solid stats for the items specifically in scope of Re-turn. I've seen vague general stats for 'plastics' which covers a multitude of items, not just plastic bottles in scope of the scheme.A long way off target, getting worse, and leading us towards heavy fines? That's not definition of success.
And when too many bottles are coming back who had the caps forcefully removed, they will just stop accepting those to give you your money back.
In broad terms yes, I get that, but specifically with regards to cans and plastic bottles, I don't see where you are getting your info from, and honestly don't think it was an issue - I rarely saw a plastic bottle or can on the ground,on recent years.A long way off target, getting worse, and leading us towards heavy fines? That's not definition of success.
thanks, very informative. I've known about the triangle of arrows chasing each other around a numeral for some years but was amazed to learn that consumers still look for the symbol on containers & products, thinking it indicates recycleability. Great deception Oil/Plastics industry.And while it's specific to the USA it's eye opening!
I rarely saw a plastic bottle or can on the ground,on recent years.
Okay, I'll take your word for it, but I'm honestly surprised.There may be fewer on the ground but a lot are going into landfill, which is an environmental disaster.
The bus stop and hedgerow by my local shop is still lettered with them.In broad terms yes, I get that, but specifically with regards to cans and plastic bottles, I don't see where you are getting your info from, and honestly don't think it was an issue - I rarely saw a plastic bottle or can on the ground,on recent years.
I presume you're talking carbon targets there, it's the plastics recycling targets I was referring to. A new cycle lane does nothing to address falling plastics recycling.We're so far off our 2030 targets, that the likes of a few cycle lanes, introduction of recycle machines to replace the use of green bins (for cans and plastic bottles), are really insignificant.
I know the primary schools try every now and then and have been for some years at this stage, but when you see the level of contamination in the bins in town that are all colour coded with pictures of what should and should not go into them, you have to wonder.The bins in the office thing, yes, I get, albeit a little bit of effort would get people into better habits - don't put the various bins beside each other, but a few very clear signs above them etc.
My last work place, in the work canteen there was endless education / signs up. The 3 bins, landfill/compost/recycling were along side each other, all different colours, with pictures on them as to what could go in to each, but compliance was terrible.Okay, I'll take your word for it, but I'm honestly surprised.
The bins in the office thing, yes, I get, albeit a little bit of effort would get people into better habits - don't put the various bins beside each other, but a few very clear signs above them etc.
This is it in a nutshell, there are a lot of people who talk the talk but don't walk the walkMy last work place, in the work canteen there was endless education / signs up. The 3 bins, landfill/compost/recycling were along side each other, all different colours, with pictures on them as to what could go in to each, but compliance was terrible.
In my small office, of 7-8 people, there was a shredding bin, confidential paper would would go in to be shredded and recycled and I'd watch people put rubbish in it, despite a rubbish bin being beside it. Everyone working in the office was educated to degree/masters+ level.
I would bring home my recycling as I knew the bins were so contaminated none would get recycled.
The resource cost of doing this must be cumulatively enormous.Every bit of packaging we get from the supermarket is washed and dried before been put in a recycling bin
At a personal level, it doesn't take any additional resources - I can't comment for others. We don't wash every bit of packaging, but any packaging that's dirty. When we're finished washing the dishes, we rinse them and let them drip dry. Even when I did have a dish washer, I always had somethings that needed to be washed by hand, they got rinsed with that left over water.The resource cost of doing this must be cumulatively enormous.
Why??The resource cost of doing this must be cumulatively enormous.