Irish Times
...many reports have linked him to the disappearance and presumed murder of a number of women in the Leinster area in the 1990s. These cases include Annie McCarrick, Jo Jo Dullard and Deirdre Jacob.However, extensive investigations by gardaí, during which Murphy was questioned and his cars and property forensically examined, found no evidence linking him to any of the cases.
Newstalk Website
Retired Detective Superintendent P.J. Brown says Murphy was considered their prime suspect. “He failed to cooperate with any of the Garda questions” he said.
“And the question as an older policeman now retired I would ask why did the disappearances stop when Larry Murphy went to prison” he added.
With regard to the apology I cannot find evidence but I am 100% certain I have heard it on radio. Unfortunately, Complainer, you'll just have to take my word for it.
Murphy got sentenced to 97 years in total for his crimes but because the sentences were to run concurrently the effective sentence was 15 years, reduced to 10.5 years with remission - how any right thinking individual can be happy that justice was done in this case is beyond me.
Gardaí have major concerns about the way the media is pursuing freed rapist Larry Murphy and believe that the conduct of the press may be putting the general public in danger.
Commissioner Fachtna Murphy and his senior management team have been alarmed at the constant coverage of Murphy's movements and are worried that the pressure could ultimately lead to the 45-year-old either re-offending or committing suicide.
A senior source close to the garda commissioner said: "A highly stressed sex offender is the most dangerous thing that can happen. He is undoubtedly under huge pressure at the moment. We think he is already at high risk of re-offending. The media say they are trying to raise public awareness about him but in reality they may actually be putting people in more danger by the manner in which he's being pursued."
Retired assistant commissioner Martin Donnellan said the excessive media coverage of Murphy could be detrimental to the work of gardaí. "Too much hysteria is unhelpful. I am confident of the garda management system in place to monitor him. People should have faith in the gardaí to do their jobs," he told the Sunday Tribune. `
The Gardai consider him so dangerous that he requires round the clock supervision by a team of Gardai, yet they wont have him sectioned? Why?
To keep the public in Fear!
Are you trying to set a world record for how many times you can say the same thing about a conspiracy involving the 'establishment' in this Country? I think we get it at this stage.
Maybe
Am I wrong?? I dont seem to think so. How about you? Do you think the Just Us system works in this country?
Well I think you are well on your way to the record!
Do I think the Guards leave him on the streets because they want us to live in fear? No, I dont.
Let me know if I beat the current record will you.
Can the Gardaí have him sectioned and sent to a Mental Home? Why arent they doing it? Because their Masters in the Law Society tell them they cant maybe?
Of course this could all be fuel to your fire. Am I correct in thinking that you seem to be suggesting that the release of this man is a conspiracy of the Gardai, courts and politicians to keep us all in a state of fear.?
for god sake...this person has been through the court system, served his sentance, and has every right to get on with his life....like it or not!
the system is not perfect! nobody is saying that it is. but its all we have to work with. like it or lump it!The OP was questioning the system that allows a vicious criminal like him back out so early.
Whats your thoughts on the system and not Larry Murphy?
the system is not perfect! nobody is saying that it is. but its all we have to work with. like it or lump it!
i hear what you are saying...but has any country in the world got a perfect system! i dont think so.If everyone thought that way then nothing would ever change.
I don't understand why "automatic remission" is frequently described as "remission for good behaviour". As far as I know if a convict behaves very badly he still qualifies for full automatic remission perhaps with a few weeks added on for various infractions.
Do judges take "automatic remission" into account when sentencing?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?