Jamie Bulger's murderer got a light sentence (2 years) for viewing and swapping the most serious category of child porn.
As only a technical point, I believe it was not the most serious category of child porn. That was the issue being made in his defence.
I think level 5 is the worst one, but either way he should not have a new identity once released, it's just a matter of time before he is caught for something else.I thought he was caught with images of different levels and some of these were described as level four, the most serious type of image?
Jamie Bulger's murderer got a light sentence (2 years) for viewing and swapping the most serious category of child porn.
Hopefully his whereabouts will be made public.
Hopefully his whereabouts will be made public.
So we can't reveal his whereabouts because of what the mob might do to him but there is no consideration given to what he might do to an innocent woman, somebody's wife or daughter or mother or sister or niece or aunt.
Is this the logic you are attempting to stand by?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?