The links between the Catholic Church and primary education in this country are very strong and historical. In many cases the schools are the property of or are built on Church / parish land, staffed by teachers who are employees of the parish via the school’s board of management, often with the local PP as the chairman and/or the bishop of the diocese as patron.
It is unsurprising therefore that these schools espouse a strong Catholic ethos and are logically seen as academies for the preparation of young Catholic minds for key sacramental milestones on the journey to Catholic adulthood through religious education and practice as part and parcel of the regular curriculum.
So where does that leave non-Catholic parents who are faced with a Hobson’s choice when it comes to finding schools they deem appropriate for their off-spring? Apparently based on the postings in this thread, which is now several degrees off-topic, pretty angry and disillusioned.
But have their feelings got an appropriate target? I don’t believe so. The anti Church-schooling posts above seem to have forgotten a number of key factors :
Rather than railing at the lack of facilities for non-Catholics in Catholic schools, why not direct that ire where it belongs, at the Department of Education and the politicians who since the foundation of the State, have ceded massive amounts of their activities and responsibilities to unpaid parish councils and boards of management? In the meantime, perhaps a nod of acknowledgment and a word of thanks in the direction of the Catholic Church wouldn’t go amiss.
How is it that the Church has played such an influential role in education and apparently continues to influence the education of young people today? I can answer this in another post as this one has dragged on a bit - sorry.
It is unsurprising therefore that these schools espouse a strong Catholic ethos and are logically seen as academies for the preparation of young Catholic minds for key sacramental milestones on the journey to Catholic adulthood through religious education and practice as part and parcel of the regular curriculum.
So where does that leave non-Catholic parents who are faced with a Hobson’s choice when it comes to finding schools they deem appropriate for their off-spring? Apparently based on the postings in this thread, which is now several degrees off-topic, pretty angry and disillusioned.
But have their feelings got an appropriate target? I don’t believe so. The anti Church-schooling posts above seem to have forgotten a number of key factors :
- Their children are pupils in schools that are more than likely parish property
- The teachers are parish employees via the school’s board of management
- The school’s chairman is more than likely the local catholic PP
- The school’s patron is more than likely the local catholic bishop
- As they are not Catholics, presumably they provide no funding to the Church that can be channelled to support its educational endeavours / responsibilities.
Rather than railing at the lack of facilities for non-Catholics in Catholic schools, why not direct that ire where it belongs, at the Department of Education and the politicians who since the foundation of the State, have ceded massive amounts of their activities and responsibilities to unpaid parish councils and boards of management? In the meantime, perhaps a nod of acknowledgment and a word of thanks in the direction of the Catholic Church wouldn’t go amiss.
How is it that the Church has played such an influential role in education and apparently continues to influence the education of young people today? I can answer this in another post as this one has dragged on a bit - sorry.