Are there companies in the UK making ventilators? I’m not aware of any. The UKs response seems strange to say the least as it’s predicted on the assumption that older people/ higher risk groups don’t live in the same households as lower risk groups.They are going to ramp up production of ventilators etc
What do you mean?It's certainly not the answer to any frontline nurses who at the moment must be petrified going to work not for themselves I might add.
Are there companies in the UK making ventilators? I’m not aware of any. The UKs response seems strange to say the least as it’s predicted on the assumption that older people/ higher risk groups don’t live in the same households as lower risk groups.
I was just not overly impressed with no problems attitude to the pubs been open this morning and this evening's attitude to UK's stupidity in my eyes.350 people died in Italy in 24 hours another 1000 there in last 5 days alone while under lockdown...I believe we are doing the right things only too slowly and with too many thick people not doing the right thing that can't be thrusted we have to take option away from them.We called for isolating our skiers to no avail ,for no Italians in Ireland for match another mistake .We called for lockdown before they done it now I see that it's prob not enough . In my oppion we won't have to wait to long to see consequences to Boris s mistakes which will also cost us ie Cheltham.not only the people there but the people crammed into bookies fighting for the same air to breath..I also believe the main suffers mentally in this will be our nurses who will have to care for a lot of careless while trying to stay safe for their own loved ones..
Response not attitude was word I should have used.At least Ireland I believe is trying to make the next right desicision.The UK like trump seem to be making it up as they go along .The isolating the older people only came long after the numbers dying went through the roof.I believe the UK like trump will change its position because soon they will put not a number on the deaths but a name.In my mind this is something that I have already done and none do I think of as weak.Responsibly I have decided that if I can get one name offthat list by getting them to stay at home I will. Not all these names are old but their time here is worth all the money in IrelandYou may well disagree with my position but please don't bring attitude, etc, into what I consider a debate and thankfully one is entitled to debate these things. Neither you or myself or indeed anyone else can say for certain who's position in procedure is the best one going forward. Great Britain have theirs, Ireland (eventually) took theirs, yet allowed thousands come home from Cheltenham without any testing whatsoever and then lambasted them as being irresponsible for going there. Thing is, they were all entitled to go there. Why didn't the Govt do something about that in the first place? Same with the rugby game v Italy, cancel the game but allow the Italians arrive en masse and mix very socially with no procedure whatever in place? The mind boggles. My point about GB's protocol in dealing with this virus is not an attitude, it's very simply asking a question and who's to say if their unpopular decision against Ireland's (now) popular decision is the correct one? If one is to take the opinion of a leading Irish consultant that at the minimum 50,000 people will need seriously intensive care and taking the fact that 20% of seriously ill patients are dying, that shows a minimum fatality of 10,000. Mother of divine mercy I can see how hugely serious this outbreak is, I understand it in the same way everyone else that reads about it does, I can see a scenario that now with all the testing starting next week we may well see hundreds of thousands of people getting the virus and thankfully huge numbers will fight it successfully but of the 20% that get hospitalised they're looking at 20% of those who might be fatalities. That could end up being a very huge number but hopefully it won't happen. These 20% rather than the 80% are the people GB are targeting, because they believe the other 80% will fight it themselves. Britain may change it's mind in what they're doing, it may not. You're well entitled to disagree with their choice but please do so in a responsible way. Ireland's choice may well prove to be the right move, it may prove disastrous. Who can say? I certainly cannot, nor can I say that another country made the right decision. However, we may well find out but it will certainly get a hell of a lot worse before it gets anywhere near better and thinking that in 2 weeks time all will return to some order is pie in the sky. We've made our bed and now we sleep in that bed.
The idea that a robotic production line which makes cars can be switched to making ventilators is utter nonsense. It’s like saying that a line producing cans of beans can do it. The companies that make ventilators have international supply chains, need injection moulded plastics, machined parts, electronics, VDU’s, silicone tubing and rubber, clean rooms, test equipment, ISO13485 certification etc.Yes, lots of 20 somethings still at home with older parents what about couples where one a diabetic etc
They are actually talking to carmakers about switching production...
Coronavirus: UK manufacturers urged to consider switching to making ventilators
Matt Hancock claims PM is talking to carmakers but some question move without more specialist medical staffwww.theguardian.com
You may well disagree with my position but please don't bring attitude, etc, into what I consider a debate and thankfully one is entitled to debate these things. Neither you or myself or indeed anyone else can say for certain who's position in procedure is the best one going forward. Great Britain have theirs, Ireland (eventually) took theirs, yet allowed thousands come home from Cheltenham without any testing whatsoever and then lambasted them as being irresponsible for going there. Thing is, they were all entitled to go there. Why didn't the Govt do something about that in the first place? Same with the rugby game v Italy, cancel the game but allow the Italians arrive en masse and mix very socially with no procedure whatever in place? The mind boggles. My point about GB's protocol in dealing with this virus is not an attitude, it's very simply asking a question and who's to say if their unpopular decision against Ireland's (now) popular decision is the correct one? If one is to take the opinion of a leading Irish consultant that at the minimum 50,000 people will need seriously intensive care and taking the fact that 20% of seriously ill patients are dying, that shows a minimum fatality of 10,000. Mother of divine mercy I can see how hugely serious this outbreak is, I understand it in the same way everyone else that reads about it does, I can see a scenario that now with all the testing starting next week we may well see hundreds of thousands of people getting the virus and thankfully huge numbers will fight it successfully but of the 20% that get hospitalised they're looking at 20% of those who might be fatalities. That could end up being a very huge number but hopefully it won't happen. These 20% rather than the 80% are the people GB are targeting, because they believe the other 80% will fight it themselves. Britain may change it's mind in what they're doing, it may not. You're well entitled to disagree with their choice but please do so in a responsible way. Ireland's choice may well prove to be the right move, it may prove disastrous. Who can say? I certainly cannot, nor can I say that another country made the right decision. However, we may well find out but it will certainly get a hell of a lot worse before it gets anywhere near better and thinking that in 2 weeks time all will return to some order is pie in the sky. We've made our bed and now we sleep in that bed.
We need to ditch this 'herd immunity' idea for the present.