Still though, less than 1% infection rate in Wuhan...
Still though, less than 1% infection rate in Wuhan...
I don't think that the Irish government can be held responsible for the cases in the North?
Why? We are aware of the cases in Northern Ireland but the Irish government and the Irish Health Service is only responsible for cases in Ireland (which, for clarity, is the name of this country).
No, it's not a 3% infection rate.I read that South Korea has run 240,000 tests and has 7000 cases which is 3% infection rate.
No, it's not a 3% infection rate.
There are 52m people.
They have about 153 positive cases per million people.
No. That would assume that the testing is completely random, and that there are over 1m undiagnosed cases.I was assuming the have done so many tests we should assume the positive cases percentage scales up to the general population eg drive through testing. But it is an assumption.
Not able to answer your specific query. However, I understand UK are alone in adopting this high stakes herd immunity approach which will probably involve asking the older generation to hunker down. They would be different wouldnt they. Some gamble with people's lives and sure if it backfires the NHS will ultimately be a lot slacker. Many scientists have come out against this approach. Wonder what the older generation think of it over there ?With all the wall to wall news I'm confused about what exactly is the different approach the UK government is doing from that of the rest of Europe including Ireland. I hear they are planning a herd immunity policy which would mean they let the virus infection run its course and if your lucky you are in the 40%. If this is so then will Ireland and Europe not have to ban all UK citizens from entering as we and Europe are doing a containment policy.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?