RTB Rent Register

Rents are more controlled now than ever before.
Yes they are. When first established, they were supposed to be for 3 years and 4 per cent increase was authorized in a time of low inflation. Now we are at 2 per cent for 6 years for the one that can reset with an inflation of about more than 3 per cent over the last year and who knows what it's going to be in the next few months.
And then everything else...
 
The tenant has 90 days to dispute the Notice of Rent Review, but this can be extended if appropriate.
That's what the RTB lady said yesterday. My sibling who thought I'm OTT this last month on getting it right/being careful/worried is slowly getting to understand why I'm so invested in the subject. If I hadn't gone back to Market Rents end of March/April I'd never have looked so closely into this.
 
Dear God, here is Micheal Martin again, speaking in Galway this time.

Rent controls and rent freezes in themselves would actually make the situation worse because it would dry up the market completely,” Mr Martin said.

What on earth does he think he has brought in, along with an eviction ban?
 
Stormy, did you do up the table yourself? Or is there an easy way to extract it from the RTB website?
They make it very difficult to extract the Determination Order data - they bizarrely save as an image.

Once you have the pdf (with the image) open, screenshot it, then use MS Excel Data From Picture function to convert to text.

1779399034075.webp
 
RTB cannot answer some of my queries, they are exceedingly difficult to contact or talk to. Was told on the phone today that a licensed estate agent/auctioneer /chartered surveyor and property managment company can help with setting the rent with an 'evaluation' by those experts. I asked why doesn't it say this on the RTB website ! crickets :rolleyes: Was quoted over and over 'we are not legal advice/seek legal advice'
 
Last edited:
'we are not legal advice/seek legal advice'
Does that happen with other state agencies?

If a member of the public rang DSP, Revenue, WRC, the Health & Safety Authority, the RSA or any other state agency to query one of their rules, would they actually tell you to seek legal advice?

Is it not their job to inform the public?
 
One of my rentals is now appearing on the RTB rent register. A mistake was made by my agent who sorted it out. Thank goodness for one here as it's been invaluable teasing all this out and if I hadn't been doing this I would not have realised it.

The rent is 60% more than the next highest property on the RTB rent register. Daft ads are similar to my rent, some are even higher. My rent was decided on the advice of 2 auctioneers. The List of 10 has 7 properties from 2025.

The 3 from 2026 are:

a) reregistration of a Feb 2025,
b) March 2026
c) reregistration of a May 2025

Under the 3 month rule, only b and c are ok. The February one is outside the 3 months. (it will be June on Monday when I'm setting the rent !)
 
Under the 3 month rule, only b and c are ok. The February one is outside the 3 months. (it will be June on Monday when I'm setting the rent !)
Does that mean that technically the rent can't be increased at all based on the RTB's rules.

Three comparables within the last 3 months are needed to re-set the rent. If only 2 are available, no rent reset at all per the RTB?
 
Does that mean that technically the rent can't be increased at all based on the RTB's rules.
I don't see how this rule can work. On the website, it is written "The tenancies must have begun in the last 3 months." Begun, not even re-register. Tenancies don't begin when LL pay the annual registration fees. If they consider that a tenancy begins with the annual registration, does this apply for the notice period too (sarcasm)?
 
Last edited:
I don't see how this "rule can work". On the website, it is written "The tenancies must have begun in the last 3 months." Begun, not even re-register. Tenancies don't begin when LL pay the annual registration fees. If they consider that a tenancy begins with the annual registration, does this apply for the notice period too (sarcasm)?
That seems to answer the question so, if no three comparable tenancies have begun within the last three months, then per the RTB you can't raise the rent at all!
 
Three comparables within the last 3 months are needed to re-set the rent. If only 2 are available, no rent reset at all per the RTB?
Actually the rent register does not even explicitly tell you the dates of the comparables. You can attempt to guess them from the registration number but that's not the same thing at all. My own tenancy from feb 2022 has 2302 in the registration number, not 2202. So technically the RTB requirement for comparables within the last 3 months is impossible since they don't provide such information. This would be worthy of a question to the RTB but they didn't even acknowledge my last question about the register never mind answer it.
 
This would be worthy of a question to the RTB but they didn't even acknowledge my last question about the register never mind answer it.
You'll be told to hire and pay a solicitor to guess what they are talking about.

Also, I'm convinced that there is back and forth between RTB staff and Threshold staff, so by asking these questions, you are only giving Threshold ideas.

The whole thing has gone absolutely mad.

The RTB are determined to ensure that every rent increase can be challenged on multiple grounds.
 
Three comparables within the last 3 months are needed to re-set the rent. If only 2 are available, no rent reset at all per the RTB?

Colleague was told recently that a comparable area could also be a similar area in a different county. How could a landlord even decide on what a similar area was in a different county unless they engaged one of the countrywide EAs who would have that expert knowledge.

The RTB website also has that guidance but it’s vague on what a similar area is and could probably change at the drop of a hat.

What happens if I can’t find a comparable example for my area?​

If there are no comparable examples for the Local Electoral Area entered, landlords can consider nearby or similar areas. Landlords must still provide three comparable examples and document the rationale for the chosen area.


Ie, is the ‘chosen area’ the similar area in a different LEA or different county?
 
If there are no comparable examples for the Local Electoral Area entered, landlords can consider nearby or similar areas. Landlords must still provide three comparable examples and document the rationale for the chosen area.
What does 'document the rationale for the chosen area' mean?

What documents do you have to provide to the RTB if you choose a different LEA? Do they provide any guidance on that?
 
I don't see how this "rule can work". On the website, it is written "The tenancies must have begun in the last 3 months." Begun, not even re-register. Tenancies don't begin when LL pay the annual registration fees. If they consider that a tenancy begins with the annual registration, does this apply for the notice period too (sarcasm)?
Very good Premos. I’ll use that- I’m in battle mode and need all your guys help. Can’t say more.
 
So it would behoove the RTB to include the tenancy start date in the information provided!
The rent register results now seem to include a new column to distinguish between new tenancies and annual registrations, and brings up 30 results instead of 10.

This seems like a welcome change, as if I put in the address of one of my properties now it brings up 3 new tenancies post March 2026 which are closer to what I would consider market rent. A month ago the highest result (of 10 shown) was €1849, which was lower than my RPZ property.


IMG_1413.webp
 
Back
Top