Re-turn in its expected funding, had a return rate of 90% set... so that it would fund itself from the 10% unclaimed deposits and the resale value of the recyclables. So if the scheme exceeds expectations, yes, they would have to go to government for more funding... or not be able to do the things they talked about doing such as recycling the items in Ireland.Sooner or later when people start bringing 99% of the material back, who is going to pay for this theater? They are certainly going to look to the taxpayer to compensate the operating loos of this and the companies that are doing the bin collections are either handing the business back to local authorities or want compensation for the millions they lose.
And in the meanwhile, they just cut down multiple mature trees in my area to make room for ....... a recycling bank for plastic and glass.
Bit of a moral hazard for Re-turn that they can hit a point where have a negative incentive to increase the return rate... so I'm not surprised we see gaps in the scheme such as:
(1) deposits being charged in airport and ferry ports where realistically most aren't going to be returned
(2) people who get shopping delivered not being catered for
(3) the large exemption size for the scheme leaves smaller villages without any option to Re-turn. The original exemption of 150 square metres should have been retained instead of the increased 250.
It's absurd that there's no option to bulk Re-turn items at Council depots, or other Council collection points.