T McGibney
Registered User
- Messages
- 7,393
Claptrap. I got it right when I noted earlier that dentists with specialised equipment would have sizeable energy bills. You incorrectly rebutted that without knowing either what you were talking about - dentistry- or what we were talking about - the selective exclusion of professional practices from this scheme..You might be used to doing the books for small business but in the context of the broader business world a dentist is a very small energy user.
I never defended the exclusion of some sectors from the scheme. I merely suggested what the rationale might be. In the context of energy use dentistry and similar industries are small energy users.Claptrap. I got it right when I noted earlier that dentists with specialised equipment would have sizeable energy bills. You incorrectly rebutted that without knowing either what you were talking about - dentistry- or what we were talking about - the selective exclusion of professional practices from this scheme.
I didn't attempt to slur anyone. I merely suggested it might be a reason you though dentistry was a high energy use sector.Nobody is contesting that other businesses have even more severe energy requirements and nowhere have I questioned anyone's entitlement to support. In this regard, your attempt to slur my clientele as solely "small business" is wholly gratuitous as well as being factually incorrect.
Indeed;But do keep personalising your arguments, it's edifying.
Amazing how people can make such ill-informed comments on this site without actually having a clue of what they're discussing.
And you were wrong. On both counts. Again.I didn't attempt to slur anyone. I merely suggested it might be a reason you though dentistry was a high energy use sector.
And you were wrong. On both counts. Again.
It might be better for us all if you confined yourself to factual comments. And stop misrepresenting others when they correct your errors.You seem unduly upset by my posts. It might be better for you if I stopped responding to yours.
around €16 millionWhats your turnover though if your using 1/4 million?
Yep, we're not a high energy user either.Elect is only less than 2% then of t/o, no different to a dentists ratio therefore
What is the difference, other than an antiquated English notion of how a particular sector is regulated?Absolutely, its unforgivable to discriminate between trade and profession.
Yes, the State is betting bigger and bigger without any discussion as to whether or not that's a good thing.The Irish tax code has been written by very clever overgrown spiders who feed off their prey who get stuck in nets to feed an expanding State that produces nothing. This injustice just highlights that.
We are hostages to the idea that the only good green energy is wind and solar and now we are paying the ransom.I believe fertilizer production has also ceased hin Europe. A colleague tells me that his electricity is around 10 or 15 cent a unit due to Hydro in the US in Washington state I believe. He said that paying 50, 100 ,150 cent a unit is ridiculous and incomprehensible.
So is the differentiation between limited liability companies and everyone else?When I worked in the UK the tax return also discriminated and segregated income into- business trade profession. I think it's based on that and no doubt the original reason was that losses or capital allowances on one head can't be offset against anothers income. Similarly in Ireland if you are in a partnership and buy a property and there's a loss on resale that loss is restricted to the partnership.
So basically the tax payer gets the worse of the bargain whilst they look like they are fair.
Not according to the Minister's Budget speech. Only a small minority of practising professionals operate via limited liability companies.So is the differentiation between limited liability companies and everyone else?
In essence does this apply to any entity that is subject to 12.5% Corporation tax, i.e. a Company.Not according to the Minister's Budget speech. Only a small minority of practising professionals operate via limited liability companies.
I'm waiting for the combined intellect of AAM to answer it for me.Surely it is time for the Taoiseach , Tanaiste or Finance minister to come in to the Dail or the telly / radio and clear up these questions ? Otherwise we are are all only speculating.
If we are to trust the Minister's words, surely it must apply to both? Mind you, his announcement that he plans to unilaterally exclude professional services businesses suggests that the whole idea may not have as yet progressed far beyond the back-of-a-beermat phase.In essence does this apply to any entity that is subject to 12.5% Corporation tax, i.e. a Company.
For example can a plumber or welder who makes gates and who have a workshop but operate as sole traders avail of the energy subsidy?
Yes , I would agree with the " back of a beer mat" analogy. You're probably being a bit charitable to the Minister there.If we are to trust the Minister's words, surely it must apply to both? Mind you, his announcement that he plans to unilaterally exclude professional services businesses suggests that the whole idea may not have as yet progressed far beyond the back-of-a-beermat phase.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?