I think my post has been misinterpreted. I meant that due to the intrinsic predatory nature of the male species under the influence of alcohol to lessen restraint, reason and inihibition, if a person - in this case a woman who is normally physically weaker - is under the influence of the same substance then quite obviously they are exposing themselves to increased risk.
BTW, inebriation is not acceptable for either gender.
I don't support the convicted man but this case may be more complex than the simplistic, gingoistic way it is being commented on due to the fact that both parties may have been inebriated.
drunken intimacy.
I think my post has been misinterpreted. I meant that due to the intrinsic predatory nature of the male species under the influence of alcohol to lessen restraint, reason and inihibition, if a person - in this case a woman who is normally physically weaker - is under the influence of the same substance then quite obviously they are exposing themselves to increased risk.
BTW, inebriation is not acceptable for either gender.
I don't support the convicted man but this case may be more complex than the simplistic, gingoistic way it is being commented on due to the fact that both parties may have been inebriated.
I think my post has been misinterpreted. I meant that due to the intrinsic predatory nature of the male species under the influence of alcohol to lessen restraint, reason and inihibition, if a person - in this case a woman who is normally physically weaker - is under the influence of the same substance then quite obviously they are exposing themselves to increased risk.
BTW, inebriation is not acceptable for either gender.
I don't support the convicted man but this case may be more complex than the simplistic, gingoistic way it is being commented on due to the fact that both parties may have been inebriated.
Have you read any of the reports? When was the last time you carried a woman to a skip to engage in drunken intimacy?Alright so man gets drunk and woman gets drunk and then engage in drunken intimacy. Result: man is totally to blame.
Right.
No, maybe he has a point; if a man assault a woman it's her fault for being attractive. She should cover up her hair and face, only go out with her father/ husband/ brother or adult son and when doing so walk 3 steps behind them with her eyes cast downward in case she accidentally sets some innocent young man into a frenzy of sexual desire.Oh thats all right then.
I am a member of a male species and I certainly don't have a instrinsic predatory nature when I am sober or drunk so speak for yourself there.
Alright so man gets drunk and woman gets drunk and then engage in drunken intimacy. Result: man is totally to blame.
Right.
I emailed a message of support to the Kerry Rape Crisis Centre and included a link to this thread, so hopefully she will see what the people here think.
The email address is:
krcc@eircom.net
what's wrong with this site? you're not allowed talk about a head cold because of medical issues, but it's ok for someone to come on here and basically says it's a women's own fault that she gets raped/sexually assulted? can the mods not remove the offensive posts or close the thread???
Poster must be a 'he'.
Thanks.
This so-called civilised and logical society which so many contributors seem to be part of can easily be dispelled:
1) Why do men 'chase' women? Like it or not ultimately for sexual reasons. A man should exercise restraint and courtesy combined with a woman having the assertiveness and presence of mind to at the very least temper his advances.
2) If a man were seen to be leading a drunken woman away suspicions would be raised. If a woman were seen leading a drunken man away nothing would be thought of it or, more than likely, observers would think well of them for their benevolence.
Obviously because of a difference in biological make-up.
3) Why are decent law-abiding men with no history of sexual misbehaviour - from groups of sportsmen to armies - capable of indulging in gang rape given the opportunity?
It's not acceptable but an unfortunate dark side to their biological make-up
4) Not related to any court case but just to illustrate the often illogical human nature:Why do people reproduce when there are compelling economic and ecological reasons not to? Why don't they just restrain themselves?
We might think ourselves sophisticated and civilised and therefore 'above all of that' but we aren't really.
This is my last post on this and I have to say I'm shocked and dismayed at the simplistic tabloidesque mentality on AAM that is so easily exposed.
Yorky has a point when he says that if a women is drunk she is at increased risk of attack. That she should not be at increased risk would be an ideal society but we do not live in anything near an ideal society. I as a female would not walk down the street at night on my own fully clothed, because I know that I increase the risk to myself of an attack. Men are stronger than women and some men are predatory. It doesn't just apply to women of course, some men prey on other men. Biologically it's impossible for a woman to rape a man, and in any case he would nearly always be able to overpower her.
Having read the above post..Poster must be a 'he'.
Thanks.
This so-called civilised and logical society which so many contributors seem to be part of can easily be dispelled
1) Why do men 'chase' women? Like it or not ultimately for sexual reasons. A man should exercise restraint and courtesy combined with a woman having the assertiveness and presence of mind to at the very least temper his advances.
2) If a man were seen to be leading a drunken woman away suspicions would be raised. If a woman were seen leading a drunken man away nothing would be thought of it or, more than likely, observers would think well of them for their benevolence.
Obviously because of a difference in biological make-up.
3) Why are decent law-abiding men with no history of sexual misbehaviour - from groups of sportsmen to armies - capable of indulging in gang rape given the opportunity?
It's not acceptable but an unfortunate dark side to their biological make-up
4) Not related to any court case but just to illustrate the often illogical human nature:Why do people reproduce when there are compelling economic and ecological reasons not to? Why don't they just restrain themselves?
We might think ourselves sophisticated and civilised and therefore 'above all of that' but we aren't really.
This is my last post on this and I have to say I'm shocked and dismayed at the simplistic tabloidesque mentality on AAM that is so easily exposed.
Why close the thread or remove those posts? The poster is being pilloried for their views, which in my view is far better than trying to sweep it all under the carpet as if to suggest this view doesn't exist.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?