Duke of Marmalade
Registered User
- Messages
- 5,578
Well yeah. @tecate The confused infidels wouldn't appreciate the theological significance but at least they would smell a rat.
Last edited:
Well yeah. @tecate The confused infidels wouldn't appreciate the theological significance but at least they would smell a rat.So if we said that they're referring to token inflation instead of the more commonly understood garden variety inflation, would that cover it?
That's only clear to someone who thinks tulips are infinite. I can see further discussion occurring in this thread.That's very much a personal matter for you - as is you coming to terms with not being able to force the discussion to your will..although clearly it's preventing any further discussion.
When you drop your finite (or rather infinite) nonsense, discussion is certainly possible.That's only clear to someone who thinks tulips are infinite. I can see further discussion occurring in this thread.
Surely discussion is possible regardless. Or do you think it impossible?When you drop your finite (or rather infinite) nonsense, discussion is certainly possible.
It depends on what you mean by 'discussion'. If by 'discussion' you mean you're going to carry on with your finite/infinite nonsense - then you know you won't be getting a response to that. If whatever point you think you've made has fallen on deaf ears or that we disagree, I suspect you'll need to adjust to that reality and respectfully disagree. At least that's what any normal person would do. Perhaps this works differently for Tulips.Surely discussion is possible regardless. Or do you think it impossible?
I get that you may choose not to reply. But surely that is not the same as discussion being impossible? Or do you really think that discussion is actually impossible?It depends on what you mean by 'discussion'. If by 'discussion' you mean you're going to carry on with your finite/infinite nonsense - then you know you won't be getting a response to that. If whatever point you think you've made has fallen on deaf ears or that we disagree, I suspect you'll need to adjust to that reality and respectfully disagree. At least that's what any normal person would do. Perhaps this works differently for Tulips.
I identified your line of questioning as obtuse, there might have been a 5% chance of me entertaining that nonsense at that point, now there's not a snowballs chance in hell. The choice here is yours. You can decide to keep referencing something I will not be indulging you by responding to or you can stop disrupting further discussion here. It really is that simple.I get that you may choose not to reply. But surely that is not the same as discussion being impossible? Or do you really think that discussion is actually impossible?
I'm trying to establish whether you really think discussion is impossible, as you claimed, as opposed to something you simply don't want to entertain. Is discussion really impossible?I identified your line of questioning as obtuse, there might have been a 5% chance of me entertaining that nonsense at that point, now there's not a snowballs chance in hell. The choice here is yours. You can decide to keep referencing something I will not be indulging you by responding to or you can stop disrupting further discussion here. It really is that simple.
It would all fall apart when tecate created a single ticket and divided it into infinite subdivisions.Lads you could sell tickets for this. @Brendan Burgess stick this one behind a paywall. You can retire with a handsome sum…