David McWilliams: "Bitcoin Betrayal"?

For someone who doesn't care, you do keep banging on about it.
Those who want an actual tangible discussion on the subject are ready any time you decide to stop being an infinite dickhead.

As I've told you, I've no interest in your infinite/finite nonsense. We're not in a conversation/discussion. You've posted what you seem to think is something incredibly important on that. We all read it. You want to re-run that 1000x. Please do that elsewhere.
 
Those who want an actual tangible discussion on the subject are ready any time you decide to stop being an infinite dickhead.

As I've told you, I've no interest in your infinite/finite nonsense. We're not in a conversation/discussion. You've posted what you seem to think is something incredibly important on that. We all read it. You want to re-run that 1000x. Please do that elsewhere.
Not that you care of course!
 
Not that you care of course!
And that's important to you why? Like I said, you have zero interest in a genuine discussion on this topic. All that you have posted and continue to post (including this gem) betrays precisely that reality.
 
And that's important to you why? Like I said, you have zero interest in a genuine discussion on this topic. All that you have posted and continue to post (including this gem) betrays precisely that reality.
You said you didn't care and I was just replaying it to you. I am of course interested in the topic, but you rather derailed dicussions when you claimed that tulips aren't finite. A genuine discussion must be based on reality. If you have an interest in progressing the discussion, then maybe you would care to correct your statement so we can continue with a genuine discussion. If you choose not to correct yourself, then you don't care if I continue, so no harm done!
 
I am of course interested in the topic,

Complete BS. If you had a genuine interest you'd drop the obtuse nonsense you went on with. If you really believe that you've solved some deep meaningful secret of the universe, well you raised it. In what world is it beneficial to force that point?

but you rather derailed dicussions when you claimed that tulips aren't finite.

So a discussion cannot continue unless you bend it to your will? lol

If you have an interest in progressing the discussion, then maybe you would care to correct your statement so we can continue with a genuine discussion.
See above. I'm not interested in your obtuse ways.

...so we can continue with a genuine discussion.
so unless everything is to your pleasing, no discussion can continue? Yeah, that makes complete sense.

If you choose not to correct yourself, then you don't care if I continue, so no harm done!

I never said harm wasn't being done - in fact, I said quite the opposite. You won't drop it until you force the outcome that you want - and for that, nobody is permitted to continue and has to read through this nonsense.

There might have been a finite amount of time within which I might have seen things your way but with every post, that outcome veers more towards the infinite. Dale Carnegie has nothing on you when it comes to influencing outcomes. :cool:

Onwards we go.
 
Complete BS. If you had a genuine interest you'd drop the obtuse nonsense you went on with. If you really believe that you've solved some deep meaningful secret of the universe, well you raised it. In what world is it beneficial to force that point?



So a discussion cannot continue unless you bend it to your will? lol


See above. I'm not interested in your obtuse ways.


so unless everything is to your pleasing, no discussion can continue? Yeah, that makes complete sense.



I never said harm wasn't being done - in fact, I said quite the opposite. You won't drop it until you force the outcome that you want - and for that, nobody is permitted to continue and has to read through this nonsense.

There might have been a finite amount of time within which I might have seen things your way but with every post, that outcome veers more towards the infinite. Dale Carnegie has nothing on you when it comes to influencing outcomes. :cool:

Onwards we go.
Not that you care.
 
Not that you care.
So you said already. Presumably it's important to you that I do or that I'm irritated by your behavior. That's the goal right? That's the reason why you've hijacked this discussion?

I've been here long enough to see this nonsense play out.

Onward we go.
 
I would really like to follow up on our discussion about finiteness of resources, but you seem reluctant to do so. I'm optimistic by nature, so will press on.
 
I would really like to follow up on our discussion about finiteness of resources, but you seem reluctant to do so. I'm optimistic by nature, so will press on.
Equally optimistic Tulip. That said, I'll make it clear that going forward pressing me repeatedly on any aspect along the lines of infinite/finite-gate will be futile. You'll either have to accept my response while respectfully disagreeing with it or I suppose we'll be transported back to a similar infinite loop as before.

Other than that, I welcome any new point of interest this discussion can bring to the subject.
 
Equally optimistic Tulip. That said, I'll make it clear that going forward pressing me repeatedly on any aspect along the lines of infinite/finite-gate will be futile. You'll either have to accept my response while respectfully disagreeing with it or I suppose we'll be transported back to a similar infinite loop as before.

Other than that, I welcome any new point of interest this discussion can bring to the subject.
When you learn to treat other respectfully, I will do my best to be respectful about your view that tulips are infinite.
 
Back
Top