Apologies, I saw your comment re. GDP but wasn't responding to it, I have been responding to this - "there needs to be a better balance between the interests of multi-nationals and the interest of the more diverse indigenous industries, which is still mostly at micro level in terms of job creation.". My point is that at best 87% or worst 75% of people are working irrelevant to these FDI companies, so saying job creation is at a micro level domestically is simply false, and if you ask me there would be little harm done shifting the balance further towards FDI jobs.But these are estimated employment figures, I referred to GDP.
is your argument that you want GDP to be a useful number to measure our economy again and that's it?
There is also the new GNI*, modified GNI, known as "GNI-star".
Why wouldn't it be? We have a relatively young population and income potential in large swathes of the country is limited.I read a recent "statistic" from revenue stating that 60% of workers earn less than 30k gross...surely cant be correct?
Why wouldn't it be? We have a relatively young population and income potential in large swathes of the country is limited.
I read a recent "statistic" from revenue stating that 60% of workers earn less than 30k gross...surely cant be correct?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?