Read the management company lease agreement that came with your house deeds and which your presumably signed. Better still read this before signing it and so you can decide in advance if the terms are acceptable to you.Hi
I am just wondering are you legally obliged to pay management fees to a company looking after an apartment complex? Who decides on the which management company? And what exactly are they responsible for?
As in any other sector people in Ireland are ripped off by management companies by extracting un-justifiable amount. What they do and what we pay actually doesnt match?
ITGuru said:We just pay whatever we are asked to pay even with out knowing what it is for or any other alternatives. In many of the cases it is developers own company which is masquerading as the management company. I think, the residents should have the right to choose the management company.
We just pay whatever we are asked to pay even with out knowing what it is for or any other alternatives.
For the umpteenth time ... in most cases the householders are or will eventually be shareholders/owners of the management company so if they're not happy with the way things are run they have the power to change things. For example by running for election to the board of directors, becoming involved in committees, changing the management agent employed, or even doing a hands on job on the day to day management of the estate. Nobody is forced to buy in a privately managed estate so if they don't like such a setup they should look elsewhere. In general I don't see that there's any rip off here..
As in any other sector people in Ireland are ripped off by management companies by extracting un-justifiable amount. What they do and what we pay actually doesnt match?
I got the letter in the post the other day about some move by the Government to examine the whole issue of private management companies in the wider context of the Law Reform Commission's study of this area.It is a pity that politicians dont care
I suspect that you are confusing management agent and management company here.I think, the residents should have the right to choose the management company.
I thought that this was the rule rather than the exception?i recently bought a house in Beaupark and the term being used by the builder was "no fees no Keys" so you have to pay the first year if you want to sign for your house.
Then your management company should have a healthy surplus/sinking fund on its first year of accounts so.Beaupark is still a building site and very little is being done, apart from Bins being collected.
If it is then it's perfectly avoidable by buying in an estate that is or will be taken in charge by the Local Authority. Nobody is forced to buy in a privately managed development.I agree with fees for Apt buildings (lifts and carpets etc), but when where they introduced for houses in estates, do i not pay tax for the DCC to come in and clean roads, ensure lights are working and general upkeep of the area. Is this not another form of Double taxation.
This could be cutting off your nose to spite your face by not enabling your management company to do the job required and in relation to which you presumably signed a legally binding lease agreement.I will not be paying these the second year!!
I thought that this was the rule rather than the exception?
Then your management company should have a healthy surplus/sinking fund on its first year of accounts so.
That remains to be seen, trying to contact them is hard enough, getting a breakdown of funds allocated to Beaupark will be a nightmare, if not impossible.
f it is then it's perfectly avoidable by buying in an estate that is or will be taken in charge by the Local Authority. Nobody is forced to buy in a privately managed development.
Its not a private estate, DCC will not come into any new housing estate until it is completely signed off, Beapark could take until 2009 to be signed off, therefore I am forced to get a mgt company in, my question was that "when and how did DCC make that decision not to enter these new estates" As a lot of these mgnt companyies are cash cows for builders I imagine they and our leaders exchanged some brown paper bags to seal the deal.
This could be cutting off your nose to spite your face by not enabling your management company to do the job required and in relation to which you presumably signed a legally binding lease agreement.
Not sure what i signed regards to mgnt fees, signed a lot of stuff around that time, but can find nothing that ties me to them. Either way i don't pay for services i do not rec.
prech said:Either way i don't pay for services i do not rec
They are not - they are normally limited companies owned by the householders who are members/shareholders who have full control over their operation. Painting it as a them and us situation is missing the point.I take your points, i have just become synical in regards to these companies,, they seem to be a law onto themselves.
Do your records contain a fully set/copy of all the legal documentation that you signed as part of the property purchase process? If not then you should indeed check with your solicitor.I don't sign anything I don't understand, and from my records cannot find any agreement between myself and mgnt company, but will consult s
Why? It's not their problem or concern that you or others decided to buy in a privately managed development and now, after the fact, don't like it.Election is coming up will blast any politican unlucky enough to knock my door.
Why? It's not their problem or concern that you or others decided to buy in a privately managed development and now, after the fact, don't like it.
Presumably you were aware of this situation when buying and went ahead regardless? Your choice. If you were not aware of this then you should be asking your solicitor why s/he didn't apprise you of this important issue.its not a private estate, its just DCC somewhere along the line, took the decision not to enter these estates until signed off by builder/DCC.
Presumably you were aware of this situation when buying and went ahead regardless? Your choice. If you were not aware of this then you should be asking your solicitor why s/he didn't apprise you of this important issue.
How?Your missing the big picture here.
Please take rants to Letting Off Steam and stick to discussing the issue in hand. Thanks.Why has this situation arose without our leaders doing something about it, (maybe because the building trade donates a lot of money to party funds or invites them to sponsored race days....go figure) the first couple of years are the hardest in a new home, yet you get this fee lumped on you for a service you should be getting for being a tax payer in this country anyway.
I'm just pointing out that nobody is forced to buy in a development which is privately managed either short term (e.g. until the LA takes it in charge) or longer term (e.g. indefinitely).you seem to have accepted a form of double taxation very easily.