P
moreover, purchasers had a realisitic expectation that the build would be complete in c. 18 months but the developer apparently got held up on an entirely separate development so did nothing on site for c. 2 years. The final completion date is a final protection for purchasers, not a target date. If the properties in question had been completed in a professional and workmanlike manner a couple of years ago, there wouldnt be a word about all this. Developer has no one to blame but themselves.
I see all your logs, I am in the same position as you. I signed a contract in may 2006 for the purchase of an apartment in
the Vantage development. I paid a deposit of €30k. my circumstances have changed completely in the past 3 years and the
mortgage company will not provide finance. I am presently being pressurised to snag the apartment. there is still scaffolding
up around the outside of the building and the rest of the site is a building site.
I would be interested in meeting everyone involved and others in a similar situation
if you are not interested in a meeting please contact me any way so we can share experience and advice.
you will though agree that wantstoknow has the right to fair protection under the law? Builder for example was also bound by an ogligation to complete the building in a professional and workmanlike manner. It is the builder's failure to do so that is the route cause of this entire situation. We should not loose sight of that fact. The laragan case was interesting in that it highlighted some of the protections that consumers have under the law that may enhance or mitigate the terms included in a specific contract.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?