Speaking of which, statistically is it better to have different tranches of these? I know that they all have equal chances, but is there a secondary statistical point that a spread of numbers is better?

No

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter Raging Bull
- Start date

Speaking of which, statistically is it better to have different tranches of these? I know that they all have equal chances, but is there a secondary statistical point that a spread of numbers is better?

No

Thanks Duke. What about the wooly answer, don't they talk about stats with roulette colours and numbers and even/odd etc. If you 'divided' all bonds into tranches of whatever, wouldn't it be statistically arguable that the same tranches would be unlikely to come up more often than others. Happy for you to tell me I'm talking nonsense!

Assuming there is no bias in the random selection....

There is no statistical reason that having any combination of numbers would give an advantage. Our minds are naturally bad at probability - they look for patterns - and casinos and bookies take advantage of that. For discreet events (each spin of the roulette wheel or each drawing of the prize bonds) previous events have zero impact.

This is why casinos display the history of the last 10 spins or so. They know that when people see that black has come up for the last 3 or 4 times, there will be an overweight betting on red - when another black is just as likely. That imbalance over time gives the house an edge.

Picking 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 is just as likely to win the Lotto as any other combination. If you win the Lotto this week, you have the exact same probability of winning it next week.

Likewise, it doesn't matter if your Prize Bond numbers are in sequence or spread all over the place - you have the exact same probability of winning

- Messages
- 1,265

- Messages
- 3,849

I reckon you should have had an average of 3 prizes. The probability of 0 prizes is 5%. Not impossible, but rather unlucky.100% agree with the above. My impression also, over the years of owning bonds.

I have 45K in three tranches for over a year and not even a sniff of a prize.

Time to cash in and reinvest.

Maybe I am a gullible soul, but it seems to me to be a conspiracy theory of the utmost improbable that the draw would be fiddled to suit any constituency such as more recent entrants.

Having said that, my <1% run continued last Friday, so could it be there is a discrimination against the aristocracy?

Picking 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 is just as likely to win the Lotto as any other combination. If you win the Lotto this week, you have the exact same probability of winning it next week.

There is a slight complication with the Lotto if you are entering multiple sets of numbers. No individual set of numbers is more likely, but given match 4 & match 5 wins, it make sense to only change one digit between selections, as this increases the number of combinations you can cover. Not relevant to most entrants, but certainly exploited by syndicates who tried to "buy" a win.

- Messages
- 3,849

I haven't been in a PaddyPower shop since early March but I was always bemused by their regular lotto and roulette plays. The screens "helpfully" keep the punters posted on the numbers that are "hot" and those which are "not". It smugly amuses me to reflect that I know better, but then I start to think "and so does PaddyPower". The display of this information can only be targeted at those who erroneously think that it does matter - are we not veering towards offences against the trade descriptions Act or some such deception?This is why casinos display the history of the last 10 spins or so.

Absolutely, but the big further complication is that the chances of sharing are greatly influenced by your choice of numbers. Avoid birthdays. And avoid picking something like 1,2,3,4,5,6 Because there is likely to be maybe a dozen such guesses.Picking 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 is just as likely to win the Lotto as any other combination. If you win the Lotto this week, you have the exact same probability of winning it next week.

Last edited:

- Messages
- 3,849

I've been thinking about that. If we imagine the populace consists of Birthday Suckers who chose their numbers from 1 to 31 and Smart Asses who chose their numbers from 32 to 47 there would have to be more than 100 times more of the former than the latter for my advice to be correct.Avoid birthdays.

There is an Uncertainty Principle at work here. Because if you could somehow work out the least popular choice, for example if detailed stats were made available, the Smart Asses would make that the most popular choice

For the first six months or so hardly a Friday went by without a win of €50, the odd time 2 X €50.

Overall about €150 pm if I remember correctly, but I do know that these prizes started to dry up somewhat

as my 'luck' dwindled..........

Anyway I withdrew the lot as I needed the funds and last year stuck in the 45K.

Now I know they have been slowly, but surely, decreasing the number of prizes, but I have to admit I am

somewhat dismayed that my 'luck' has deserted me totally.

Only for bad luck I'd have none at all.

- Messages
- 826

- Messages
- 3,849

At last my losing run ended, €50 today. The run was over 100/1 against.I win another €50 today..now I'm tempted to buy more

For the first six months or so hardly a Friday went by without a win of €50, the odd time 2 X €50.

Overall about €150 pm if I remember correctly, but I do know that these prizes started to dry up somewhat

as my 'luck' dwindled..........

Anyway I withdrew the lot as I needed the funds and last year stuck in the 45K.

Now I know they have been slowly, but surely, decreasing the number of prizes,but I have to admit I am

somewhat dismayed that my 'luck' has deserted me totally.

Only for bad luck I'd have none at all.

The number of €50 prizes is a factor of the interest rate applying to Prize Bonds. In early 2015 the interest rate was 1.6%. Today it is .5%. So there has been a very significant reduction in the number of prizes available.

- Messages
- 1,265

The number of €50 prizes is a factor of the interest rate applying to Prize Bonds. In early 2015 the interest rate was 1.6%. Today it is .5%. So there has been a very significant reduction in the number of prizes available.

I have just checked my winnings on a €50K investment.

2016 €400 (8*50)

2017 €300 (6*50)

2018 €100 (2*50)

2019 €150 (3*50)

2020 0000000 to date!

- Messages
- 817

Nothing for me today a big ZERO

How about you Sparkrite