ubiquitous
Registered User
- Messages
- 3,782
Spending public services too thinly across the whole country instead of concentrating on provided excellent services in areas where a critical mass exists is non-sensical.
Do you propose then to unilaterally withdraw public services from people who already live in rural areas and have done so for decades?
Would this be economic? Look at the cost of CPO-purchased land for road developments. If there was a market in this, the landowners would be doing it already.3. Built up tourist industry but providing CPOing a network of walking/cycling trails across mountains, along canals and rivers. Growing market.
4. Heavily audit public and civil service, ideally by Comptroller and Auditor General
Sorry, the C&AG have already been doing this for many years.
.Should offer voluntary redundancy to the mad, the bad and the sad.
The public sector already offers exceptionally generous early retirement terms to employees who are sick or otherwise unable to work. Also, fwiw, given the amount of depression and suicide in this country, some people might find the use of terms such as "the mad, the bad and the sad" objectionable. I certainly do.