If they had to compensate people for making mistakes, then they could not function and the entire commercial system would cease to function.
If they had to compensate people for mistakes made, they would have an incentive to make fewer mistakes. They charge a high price for their service, why should your time in defending a false claim not also be valued?
Brendan. Sorry I do not see your point. I am not trying to gain out of this, just to stop this practice.
In certain cases of 'wrongful prosecution' in this country and the UK that has in fact happened.So should anyone found not guilty in a criminal case have their legal fees paid for by the state?
It is highly unlikely Intrum will take you to court. They have no legal powers whatsoever. Intrum are like a toothless Rottweiler, all bark and no bite. They only do what their master, the original creditor says.Firstly, they have not told me if they have ceased proceeding, I could still end up in court, Secondly, and apology would be in order. Financially enough to hurt them, I would give it to charity. But satisfaction would be to have a government department stop this practice.
Should I take action for compensation? They cannot just send letter out like this without substantiating it.
Brendan. Sorry I do not see your point. I am not trying to gain out of this, just to stop this practice. Why should they cause people the worry of legal action? I still do not know if I am cleared. If the system has to stop because people/companies send harmful letters then so be it.
Is there a state agency to which I can complain ?
Well you were not defamed as they did not publish it, so you have no case there.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?