Have to ? Why, if they dodge it by taking annual leave, are the Union 'heavies' gonna break their legs or something ? I though this was a (somewhat) free country.If they are members of the union they will have to participate in the industrial action. Taking annual leave is the same as passing the picket.
If you're in a union then it's majority rules. If you don't agree with your union then leave. It's not a la carthyism.
Or Just don't join in the 1st place as i have done.
If you're in a union then it's majority rules. If you don't agree with your union then leave. It's not a la carthyism.
Not everything the majority deceides is good and there must be legal ways to ensure that a person right to work are not interfeared with.
I have no time for unions. The people running my union will not have to take the levy and are on much higher salary than me, so what is their motivation ??
I am not a sheep and when i ask people why they are in the union they just say....ah sure ya have to be or oh you never know when you'll need them.
Why would i consider leaving ??? I have told workers that i will cross the picket, i have also said that any abuse towards me will be dealt with as well. I will not be bullied into joining a union or doing something because everyone else is doing it.
it is a personal choice and i stand by it.
That's democracy for you!
I'll just pull a sickie.
"yeah yeah i know i'm a scab"
My friend on €20k a year loses a day's pay to strike next week cos he feels he'll be letting himself down if he doesn't. He can't afford this exta levy, only took the job in the first place because of the benefits despite the poor salary. Now he loses more of his salary for the same benefits he was always going to get.
tell him to go out and get a job in the private sector then. less pay, no pension, longer hours, and the possibility of losing his job then after all of that.
tell him to go out and get a job in the private sector then. less pay, no pension, longer hours, and the possibility of losing his job then after all of that.
No, that’s called the tyranny of the majority. The reason countries have constitutions is to protect the people in these circumstances.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?