Doesn't really change anything if it's one house or three houses. What I posted here still applies although the connection charges will presumably apply per dwelling.
My reading of the first post says 3 houses were supplied from existing well,You didn't say anything about 3 houses? Which 3 houses? That people are living in?
I do occasionally wonder about the logistics of having upstairs grey water used to flush downstairs toilets.why new houses aren’t mandated to have rainwater for toilets
Most systems are gravity fed here, simply running a pipe from the tank in the attic to all toilets is the simplest and cheapest option. Any alternative involves additional logistics, and if you want to go for rainwater harvesting then you're adding thousands in equipment and fittings along with the cost of ongoing maintenance of the pump and filtration system along with electricity costs to run the pump.I do occasionally wonder about the logistics of having upstairs grey water used to flush downstairs toilets.
I presume the OP didn't come here looking for sympathy? Presumably they wanted a simple, honest answer to the question they posed?FWIW, I'm somewhat bemused at the sarcasm and complete lack of sympathy in some of the replies to a relatively simple request for advice. I've often thought, with regard to some of the contributors to AAM (yourself included Brendan!), if you don't have anything positive to contribute then perhaps it's best not to say anything at all.
Are you sure about that?Ironically, it would seem some of the urban contributors would take grave offence at the "taxpayer" via Uisce Eireann having a public service remit to supply water to an isolated rural dwelling
Where would the water meter be located? If it's up near the house on their land, then Irish water own it all the way up and it will all have to be done and in accordance with their requirements. They'll want it in the road or road verge. If it's located down near the existing connection and you own it all the way up, then you won't be allow share or subdivide it.The alternative would be to investigate the (probably impractical) option of running a pipeline yourself to the nearest mains collection point. Ideally this would need to be buried, but if you were willing to run the risk of frost damage and had permission from landowners you could technically run it overground. The best alternative option would be to try to negotiate with neighbours with a view to sharing their water supply and running a pipeline from there to the affected houses, or look at an alternative convenient location where a well might be feasibly sunk from where a pipeline could be run at a lesser cost.
Nobody but you dragged the Shannon into this thread.but would see no contradiction in the necessity for the huge expenditure involved in running a water scheme from the Shannon basin to supply Dublin
I don't think that Dublin should get water from the Shannon when Ireland must be the wettest country in Europe ! In addition when this scheme gets going it will likely be another financial disaster like the children's hospital ......Nobody but you dragged the Shannon into this thread.![]()
Like I said "probably impractical". I imagine UE have all kinds of conditions in place prohibiting this kind of thing, so any solution like this would have to be "under the radar"Where would the water meter be located?
Sympathy mightn't have been the right word - perhaps a degree of empathy or understanding of the dilemma might have been bettersympathy
Nobody but you dragged the Shannon into this thread.![]()
If leaks were fixed there'd likely be no need for shannon water in Dublin.don't think that Dublin should get water from the Shannon
Are you sure about that?
He literally sold off his water supply, without knowing there was a solution. I do have sympathy for him, but that’s of zero help.Out here in the real world how many of his neighbours will be sympathetic enough to fund him an Irish Water connection or allow him access to their water or allow him to dig thru their land to get to water?Sympathy mightn't have been the right word - perhaps a degree of empathy or understanding of the dilemma might have been better
That doesn’t say they have to supply water for free.UE state that they "are responsible for the delivery of secure, safe, and sustainable water services for the people of Ireland." That seems like a public service obligation to me....
It's irrelevant to the original poster's question.Discussions of the public service obligation of UI to provide a water supply to all residents of the country naturally encompass the proposal to pipe water from the Shannon to Dublin, as Dublin is no longer able to adequately regulate it's water consumption or guarantee a supply from the Liffey water shed. Therefore this issue is as relevant to the discussion as supplying isolated rural dwellings.
He literally sold off his water supply, without knowing there was a solution.
So you kept the water supply? Or is this a different water supply? And you need to get it from the well to the 3 houses, this is very confusing.we still have the well but an electricity pole would have to be brought back to said area for pump and then pumped to houses .Its about 300 feet from house but the field is elevated and as we all know water won't flow uphill
Or is the well in the old house which has been sold? If that's the case and the pipes are there, why didn't you transfer a right of way (easement) for the water?Its a spring well in the middle of a field which has been fenced and secured by concrete which flowed via gravity and pipes underground to a central well on the grounds of old house and pumped to farm and all 3 houses via pipes under road
At this stage I just want a permanent water system and more than willing to pay for it as I have payed for everything my whole life and am not looking for handouts as previous post have stated