Duke of Marmalade
Registered User
- Messages
- 4,717
Exactly! Did Dev build something into Bunrat that insists on privacy of the State currency even for criminal activity?In other words, complete privacy unless there is a suspicion
Exactly! Did Dev build something into Bunrat that insists on privacy of the State currency even for criminal activity?In other words, complete privacy unless there is a suspicion
My reading of this thread + some googling is that there's no firm/precise committment to privacy (not counting vague statements).One of the disappointments as far as I am concerned is this commitment to privacy
I've never understood the privacy argument against spending on cards. They may know how much you've spent in Dunnes, Boots and Amazon but they've no idea what you've bought.My larger expenditures are all documented on my AIB bank statement anyway
I don’t think double spending can arise with a central currency. When you flash your AIB debit card at the till AFAIK AIB instantly reduce your account balance and you can’t spend that money again. With a decentralised currency on an open source platform there needs time for everyone to agree that you owned the coin. An essential feature of Bitcoin is that when after say 10 minutes the miners have agreed you owned the coin your transfer to a new owner is recorded on the ledger and ithe coin remains traceable back to its creation.@Brendan Burgess did mention "There will be no record of the transaction.", however, I don't see how that could possibly work, as there needs to be a record in order to prevent double-spending. Even Bitcoin has a ledger where all transactions are recorded
"Sorry, the value of Bitcoin declined over the 10 minutes needed to confirm the transaction. You need to pay more"when after say 10 minutes the miners have agreed you owned the coin your transfer to a new owner is recorded
Dunnes, Boots and Amazon know, though. (As an aside, that's the main reason that retailers run loyalty programmes — so they can harvest that information and monetize it in various ways.)I've never understood the privacy argument against spending on cards. They may know how much you've spent in Dunnes, Boots and Amazon but they've no idea what you've bought.
To give up your privacy to prevent crime is to accept totalitarianism.One of the disappointments as far as I am concerned is this commitment to privacy. I saw it as a perfect way to reduce or at least detect crime.
And I was brought up to believe that totalitarianism was all badTo give up your privacy to prevent crime is to accept totalitarianism.
This sounds like an American on a cruise insulting the local currency.Bahamas : Sand Dollar
Or The DonaldThis sounds like an American on a cruise insulting the local currency.