Commission on Welfare and Taxation

the Commission of Taxation and Welfare is being established to independently consider how best the taxation and welfare systems can support economic activity and promote increased employment and prosperity, while ensuring that there are sufficient resources available to meet the costs of public services and supports in the medium and longer term.
I always thought that was why we elected politicians.

Why is this function being outsourced to an unelected quango?
 
I always thought that was why we elected politicians.

Why is this function being outsourced to an unelected quango?
The Commission will advise Government. Government will make decisions.

It's not reasonable to expect elected politicians to do hugely detailed work on every possible issue.
 
The Commission will advise Government. Government will make decisions.

It's not reasonable to expect elected politicians to do hugely detailed work on every possible issue.
I thought that's why we had senior civil servants in the Department of Finance but yes, outside advice is a good idea. My issue is that this isn't really outside advice; these guys are insiders.
 
I always thought that was why we elected politicians.

Why is this function being outsourced to an unelected quango?
Constitutional Convention (a collection of the idle and old). The 'Social(ist) Partners' (look how well that worked out!). Governments are terrified of making decisions.
 
Constitutional Convention (a collection of the idle and old). The 'Social(ist) Partners' (look how well that worked out!). Governments are terrified of making decisions.
Don't recall 'idle and old' being in the selection criteria for the Constitutional Convention or Citizens Assembly, the ones that moved us significantly down the road on Marriage Equality and Repeal. They both met at weekends iirc, and had a representative sample of age and other criteria.

There is some truth in your point about Governments terrified of making decisions, but they're damned if they do and damned if they don't.
 
Don't recall 'idle and old' being in the selection criteria for the Constitutional Convention or Citizens Assembly, the ones that moved us significantly down the road on Marriage Equality and Repeal. They both met at weekends iirc, and had a representative sample of age and other criteria.
I can't see too many working people with families being able to participate in the Citizens Assembly. In that sense it is a self selecting group from within the cohort originally identified by Red C.
 
I can't see too many working people with families being able to participate in the Citizens Assembly. In that sense it is a self selecting group from within the cohort originally identified by Red C.
Lots of working people with families get involved in politics or activist groups or campaigns. I'd say many of them would be fascinated by the opportunity to take part in the Citizens Assembly and even influence the outcome. It is indeed self-selecting as is every single public consultation, including elections.
 
Lots of working people with families get involved in politics or activist groups or campaigns. I'd say many of them would be fascinated by the opportunity to take part in the Citizens Assembly and even influence the outcome.
Yep, but many just wouldn't have the time. I'm a single parent so there's no chance someone like me could do it.
It is indeed self-selecting as is every single public consultation, including elections.
Ah now voting is a bit less of a commitment, I'm sure you'd agree.
 
Interesting post from Steven Barrett in the thread on the Pensions Commission Report


For me, it lacks independence. In the first meeting, Humphrey's told them that decreasing the State pension wasn't an option. And we have since the pension go up by €5 in the Budget.

If you appoint a Commission, you really should give it free rein.

In the UK, the former Chief Scientific Officer found it necessary to set up "Independent Sage" .

Official Sage is the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies


What is Independent SAGE?
Independent SAGE is a group of scientists who are working together to provide independent scientific advice to the UK government and public on how to minimise deaths and support Britain’s recovery from the COVID-19 crisis


Maybe that is what we need in Ireland?
An Independent Tax and Welfare Commission
An Independent Pensions Commission
An Independent Housing Commission

Not working in conflict with the official Commissions, but complementing them.
 
Why do we bother with these echo chambers?

It is pure window dressing. Same as the Fiscal Advisory Council, Low Wage Commission etc

Why is this function being outsourced to an unelected quango?

The purpose is to provide plausible defence mechanism for politicians. In fairness, they get enough grief so these 'Commissions' are set up as distractions, albeit with well intentioned personnel on board most of the time.

If Low Pay Commission says minimum wage should rise by €0.50c an hour then the dilemma for government is not whether minimum wage should rise by €0.50c an hour or not, but rather do they follow the advice of the Commission or not regardless of any amount of increase in minimum wage.

The opposition, regardless of who they are, will argue one of two things.

1) If the government implements the advice of the Low Pay Commission then the government should have, could have done more.

Or

2) if the government ignores low pay commission then opposition will argue government has ignored advice of commission so why have them there in first place.

* apologies, watching re-runs of Yes Minister, and this circus is all too familiar.
 
In fairness, they get enough grief so these 'Commissions' are set up as distractions, albeit with well intentioned personnel on board most of the time.
Working in the industry and as someone always looking for content for my blog (if there's any topics people want covered, let me know ;)), I have read a countless number of roadmaps and commission reports over the year. Yet the governments do nothing about them. The State pension is too big an issue to handle without making very unpopular decisions e.g. a 6% tax increase for business owners and a 4% tax increase for retirees. It is too easy to kick the can down the road, knowing that they will be out of power when it really does start to become an issue. I've no idea what stage the the auto enrollment pension is at and we are 3.5 years in on it being in the Pensions Roadmap. That is a massive undertaking to get that up and running and at very little return for those who will run it.

The problems aren't going away.
 
Yep, but many just wouldn't have the time. I'm a single parent so there's no chance someone like me could do it.

Ah now voting is a bit less of a commitment, I'm sure you'd agree.
I'm wondering what they could practically do to enable wider participation - on-site childcare might be an option for those with younger kids. I'm not sure there is any real option to assist parents of teenagers, for example.



Interesting post from Steven Barrett in the thread on the Pensions Commission Report




If you appoint a Commission, you really should give it free rein.

In the UK, the former Chief Scientific Officer found it necessary to set up "Independent Sage" .

Official Sage is the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies


What is Independent SAGE?
Independent SAGE is a group of scientists who are working together to provide independent scientific advice to the UK government and public on how to minimise deaths and support Britain’s recovery from the COVID-19 crisis


Maybe that is what we need in Ireland?
An Independent Tax and Welfare Commission
An Independent Pensions Commission
An Independent Housing Commission

Not working in conflict with the official Commissions, but complementing them.
Is there any indication that the current Commissions AREN'T already independent? I'm not sure we need doubling up of Commissions. The whole purpose of the current Commissions is to get an independent view, away from politicians and civil servants.
 
It is pure window dressing. Same as the Fiscal Advisory Council, Low Wage Commission etc



The purpose is to provide plausible defence mechanism for politicians. In fairness, they get enough grief so these 'Commissions' are set up as distractions, albeit with well intentioned personnel on board most of the time.

If Low Pay Commission says minimum wage should rise by €0.50c an hour then the dilemma for government is not whether minimum wage should rise by €0.50c an hour or not, but rather do they follow the advice of the Commission or not regardless of any amount of increase in minimum wage.

The opposition, regardless of who they are, will argue one of two things.

1) If the government implements the advice of the Low Pay Commission then the government should have, could have done more.

Or

2) if the government ignores low pay commission then opposition will argue government has ignored advice of commission so why have them there in first place.

* apologies, watching re-runs of Yes Minister, and this circus is all too familiar.
The Fiscal Advisory Council is a different kettle of fish all together. It has full-time, permanent staff (a bunch of economists) and isn't timebound like the Commission on Taxation and Work or Commission on Defence Forces. They have a decent record for standing up to and disagreeing with Government, and warning Government about certain actions.
At the end of the day, the Government make the final decision and that's the way things are.
 
I'm wondering what they could practically do to enable wider participation - on-site childcare might be an option for those with younger kids. I'm not sure there is any real option to assist parents of teenagers, for example.
It's probably as good as it can be. My point is that it is relatively self selecting.
Is there any indication that the current Commissions AREN'T already independent? I'm not sure we need doubling up of Commissions. The whole purpose of the current Commissions is to get an independent view, away from politicians and civil servants.
It's not that they aren't independent, it's that they are all from inside the current establishment. If you want fresh thinking you need fresh minds. I firmly believe that if the boards of the worlds large banks had more women on them (40-50% minimum) 15-20 years ago we wouldn't have had the global banking crisis. Group think is the enemy of innovation.
 
The problem with setting up all those commissions and advisory panels, scientists, etc, is that the powers that be, ie, The Goverment, don't give them any power to implement their findings or anything else either. We then have the politics of it coming home to roost, in that the findings wouldn't be popular decisions if implemented. Why not give some power to all those bodies that are set up, and take the politics out of it.
 
The Oireachtas.

Why would you want to give an unelected quango the power to frame and implement taxation and welfare policy?
I didn't say I wanted to, but the reality is, they're doing it every day. What do you think top civil servants do?
 
Back
Top