Changes to rent controls announced - thread for clarifying

and general trajectory of travel of the rules kinda tell you everything you need to know.
And the trajectory is towards more restrictions. This rent index was just added. This was not in the July press release and it's clear intention is to base 'market' rents on index averages

The direction of travel is going one way only - towards more restrictions
 
trajectory is towards more restrictions.

Thats my base case….if and it’s a big if…..all these supply side measures don’t actually lead to the avalanche of increased supply that James Browne thinks will occur…..this is last chance saloon…..renters /prospective home owners need to feel a surge in housing availability & moderating prices soon….when that doesn’t appear EVERY political party is going to become even more populist as a response to further surge in public anger.
 
Is there more information on when the new legislation is supposed to be published? I know that November was announced but I read very little on that since then.
 
Is there more information on when the new legislation is supposed to be published? I know that November was announced but I read very little on that since then.
The new system was approved by the Cabinet last week or the week before, so the Heads of the Bill should be on the way shortly. I'd say they'll produce something in November
 
Sorry I put this in wrong thread earlier and got deleted so I will try again and am looking for your thoughts and feedback yet again.Thanks for the replies received earlier.

I gave a tenant a NOT in August and she has now moved out.
I spoke to an estate agent who will sell my property for me.
He has attended the rental reform meetings and is a member of IPOA so he is well informed.

He tells me that because I gave a NOT and a no fault eviction ,if an investor buys my house and lets it to a new tenant after March he cannot charge market rent.

Obviously this would prevent investors buying my house because I was way under market rent.
This also means my house could only be bought by an owner occupier..

I do understand fully that if I gave a NOT for a no fault eviction that I could not set to market rent on a future tenancy.no problem there.

Has the clear distinction been made between
1.a property owner giving a no fault eviction who is not allowed to charge market rent on the next tenancy (I understand this)

2. A property owner giving a no fault eviction who sells the property to an investor.Is he allowed or not allowed to charge market rent?

A lot of Landlords gave NOT and no fault evictions on hearing of the upcoming legislation. These same Landlords had long term tenants on very generous terms and were happy with that.
So this has the potential to come back to bite them when investors are not interested and the only option is to sell to an owner occupier .

Its very hard to keep up with all the upcoming changes.

Any thoughts/feedback. Is there a clear distinction?

Is it still a but if a grey area until we see legislation?
Thanks
 
Unfortunately, during the IPOA-hosted webinar, representatives from the Department of Housing explicitly confirmed that the lower rent would continue to apply where a previous tenancy ended due to a no-fault eviction—even in the event of a property sale. Although the legislation has not yet been published, this seems to reflect the intended policy direction.

As feedback, it’s hard to avoid the conclusion that on the whole the proposals are a major blow to the viability of private rented accommodation. It’s difficult to see how new supply can be encouraged when investors are treated like this.
 
Unfortunately, during the IPOA-hosted webinar, representatives from the Department of Housing explicitly confirmed that the lower rent would continue to apply where a previous tenancy ended due to a no-fault eviction—even in the event of a property sale. Although the legislation has not yet been published, this seems to reflect the intended policy direction.
That is crazy - it makes no sense.

So, if I evict and sell my property now which was rented at €1,000 per month - if any investor ever buys that property in the future, it must be rented at that amount plus the annual 2% - is that correct?

Is this the situation, I'm A and I sell, B buys it and it is his family home, B sells it a number of years later to an investor and the investor's rent is €1,000 plus 2% pa. Is that correct?

And when the investor's first tenants leave, his next tenants' rent is confined to €1,000k plus 2% and so on?

In effect, if a rental house has undergone a no fault eviction at anytime and comes back into the rental market, it is 'cursed' with its original rent forever.

I'm now convinced that lunatics are writing PRS policy in the Department of Housing!
 
So this has the potential to come back to bite them when investors are not interested and the only option is to sell to an owner occupier .
I suspect at this stage that owner occupiers are the major purchasers anyway. I went to view a house today out of curiosity in a rental area. Open viewing so a large crowd because the house is in move-in condition and went on the market at a reasonable price (bidding has now pushed it much higher). All young couples or young people with parents. I spoke to the auctioneer as well. She had one enquiry from an investor, everybody else is a first time buyer. She has a few down sizers as well.
 
When I try to dig a bit deeper I have read that no fault evictions only come into law in 1/3/26.
What happens in the meantime when you are selling up now and no fault evictions have not yet come into law?
I have terminated a current tenancy under current rules before no fault evictions become law.
Have I broken the no fault eviction rule at all?
 
Have I broken the no fault eviction rule at all?
Very good question @Millie*

There are so many rules at this stage that they are starting to clash with one another. It is an awful mess - we'll have to await the legislation yet again to see if there is any answer to this
 
So you have to sell it or use for a family member. Its not that complicated..
While the issue isn’t complex, the core concern is that the property would be sold at a diminished value—since it cannot re-enter the rental market at the prevailing market rate.

Is this the situation, I'm A and I sell, B buys it and it is his family home, B sells it a number of years later to an investor and the investor's rent is €1,000 plus 2% pa. Is that correct?
That specific question wasn’t addressed. However, it was asked whether existing exemptions—such as a property being off the rental market for two years—would still apply after March 26. The representatives were unable to confirm either way

When I try to dig a bit deeper I have read that no fault evictions only come into law in 1/3/26.
Would you mind sharing the source where you read that?
 
sell it or use for a family member.
I think their point is what happens if they sell it, new buyer lives in it, then sells in 3yrs. Is the rent still capped back to what it was 3yrs prior? That hardly seems fair. It also will not increase the supply of new rental properties, if an old below market rate follows the property for years, even when notice was served before the new laws came into effect.

Edit: for spelling and clarity.
 
Last edited:
There is a good market at the moment. So the very vast majority of properties can be sold at market value to owner occupiers. Time for LLs to stop complaining and move on. All the various scenarios of the new rules have been very well teased out on AAM .

Speaking as a long time LL in process of getting out.
 
I am selling up too, but that's hardly the point of the thread, or legislation.
These new rules are touted as increasing supply, allowing rents to reset etc. Yet, the threads or posts you refer to where all scenarios have been teased out, dont indicate that the stated objectives will be achieved.
Ultimately all that is certain, is uncertainty, and indecision seems to be a conscious decision. That suits neither landlord or tenant.
 
So be it...thats what the Govt have decided
Are we really not to point out the national implications of this? That feels like giving up. I recently spoke with a TD who hadn’t grasped the details of the proposals, and once I laid out certain elements, he recognised the issues they would create.
 
Back
Top