Charged with what?
Fomenting dissent, or whatever. Surely we canIf for example there was an upsurge in vandalism or burglary at holiday homes, the owners could well have valid a case against the Council.
Charged with what?
Fomenting dissent, or whatever. Surely we canIf for example there was an upsurge in vandalism or burglary at holiday homes, the owners could well have valid a case against the Council.
While I disagree with him the fact that he’s a landlord in Galway City is hardly relevant to the substantive point he’s making.He’s a busy lad in fairness. Landlord, author and part owner of at least two other businesses.
Little wonder he hasn’t had time to think through his thoughts before he commits them to email
While I disagree with him the fact that he’s a landlord in Galway City is hardly relevant to the substantive point he’s making.
Would he be in favour of doing the same thing to owners of large houses around the country in which only one of two people live? If we're talking about the impact of under occupancy on our housing shortage then that's a much bigger problem. He could start a "Boycott the Grannies" campaign.Last week, Tom Gilligan, the director of services for housing and roads at Mayo County Council, proffered an alternative solution to the nation’s ongoing housing problems by suggesting a ‘boycott’ of all holiday-home owners. This “peaceful, non-violent civil action” would have encouraged those living among Co Mayo’s some six thousand holiday-home owners to avoid any engagement with these “bad neighbours”, embark on public campaigns, host community meetings, and apply “social pressure” to the home-owners via open-letters and local resolutions.
As long as they are paying the full cost of it themselves then that would work... my point was that targeting holiday homes is populist and would have little impact on the overall national problem.Thanks for that @Purple . . . Or send the grannies and grandads into one of the many care-homes around the country including those featured on tv after the news last night. What could possibly go wrong? Please lead by example.
The answer is staring us all in the face, forced euthanasia for all over 75.Thanks for that @Purple . . . Or send the grannies and grandads into one of the many care-homes around the country including those featured on tv after the news last night. What could possibly go wrong? Please lead by example.
Let's see if you feel the same way when you're in your seventiesThe answer is staring us all in the face, forced euthanasia for all over 75.
That's a bit severe. How about making it so that retirement benefits last for a maximum of 20 years. After that time you stop getting your pension or access to free healthcare and you are subject to a 10% [property tax. If you're a bricklayer and you're physically crocked at 65 then retire in the comfortable knowledge that you'll be well dead by 85. If you spend your day polishing the backside of your trousers at a desk and are in good health at 65, expecting to live for another 30 years or so, then you should work on until you are 75.The answer is staring us all in the face, forced euthanasia for all over 75.