Paul O Mahoney
Registered User
- Messages
- 1,844
Ok I'm a little taken aback by these reasons especially from knowing your other views and the work you have done during your life.If a 3rd dose of any vaccine is made available to me, I'll take it on the following (no partular order):-
1. It'll make me feel safer.
2. It's free.
3. I believe lots of aid sent to 3rd World Countries never get to the intended destination or people.
4. Even articles in the Lancet informing us there is no need for the booster don't hold too much weight for me.
5. If I refuse 3rd dose, it does the rest of the Irish community no favours.
6. Since Covid I have an Ireland-First policy.
Look at mine no payments to directors we aren't all gangsters and do believe in Altruism. And I know what you were saying it's just that perhaps just perhaps the lessons of the past might be forgotten?Fair comment, Paul. But, I'm turned off completely by the amount of gangsters there are involved in the "Charity" Industry. Many of them use the charities for their own well being. Living near me, there are two leading lights in the Charity Industry. It's their sole occupation and have recruited their families into the game. Very few looking in here could afford their lifestyle and the houses in which they live not to mention their extensive holiday homes abroad. Ask yourself who is paying for this?
If anybody doubts what I am saying take a look at some of the websites and advertising these businesses (I'm refusing to call them Charities) do. You'll see the CEO photographed with some glamorous model brought especially in for the photo-shoot. Then there's the family back up with huge salaries for sealing envelopes and managing to walk to some post-box after dining in some expensive restaurant. The on-the-ground workers in these businesses must get a bit browned off too seeing the CEO and family living in unbelievable luxury while they give their time and efforts for free.
There must be a better way and I'll admit I can't see it. And . . . . . . . . I wish I were wrong.
Yes. You are back....We've gotten off topic a bit, any views on the OP ?
Thought OP meant opening post, I'm but a mere novice with this interwebby yoke and all the abbreviations that ride with it.Yes. You are back....
I think Kimmage Girl was alluding to the fact that you were trying to control the direction of "your" thread.Thought OP meant opening post, I'm but a mere novice with this interwebby yoke and all the abbreviations that ride with it.
I know for a fact that I have a couple of dormant accounts in the EBS Building Society. Nobody from that organisation has ever tried to contact me in any way to remind me that these accounts are still there. Nearly 20 years now.Lots of money lying around in unsold shares and dormant accounts
This is disinformation.you are all aware of the numbers right?......not the daily fear drilling numbers but the Vaccination deaths and injuries. for example the EUDRA Vigilance which is the European reporting system for the injured and deaths which is also known to be severely under reported as the reporting system is extremely laborious (9 page document and difficult to report neurological symptoms) over 24000 dead and 2, 190,500 injuries. the American system for reporting adverse reactions and deaths is called the VAERS, please look up its all public government data. I am amazed to hear so much discussion on figures and not much mention of these figures...
Still tilting at Windmills I see.you are all aware of the numbers right?......not the daily fear drilling numbers but the Vaccination deaths and injuries. for example the EUDRA Vigilance which is the European reporting system for the injured and deaths which is also known to be severely under reported as the reporting system is extremely laborious (9 page document and difficult to report neurological symptoms) over 24000 dead and 2, 190,500 injuries. the American system for reporting adverse reactions and deaths is called the VAERS, please look up its all public government data. I am amazed to hear so much discussion on figures and not much mention of these figures...
Why would you jump straight to make the point that I am someone trying to spread fake news? why would someone do that anyway I'm wondering....Im well able to decipher fake information from scaremongering and fear drilling.... the CDC have a new interesting rule.. if someone were to pass away within 14 days of the Vaccine, their death is recorded as being an unvaccinated death.. so not linked to the Vaccine.This is disinformation.
It does not mean 24000 people died from taking a vaccine. It means that 24000 people died after taking a vaccine.
Either you are not aware enough to know this and have been fooled by people spreading fake news, or you do know this and are deliberately spreading fake news. Either way it's fake news and you need to stop spreading it or increase your baloney detection skills.
This scurrilous nonsense as been completely debunked by multiple reputable news organistions.
“Many suspected ADRs reported on a Yellow Card do not have any relation to the vaccine or medicine and it is often coincidental that they both occurred around the same time,” an MHRA representative told Reuters in a previous fact check
Fact Check-Video misinterprets data of possible adverse drug reactions reported to the Yellow Card scheme
A video on social media has spread misinformation about the numbers of possible adverse drug reactions reported to the UK’s Yellow Card scheme.www.reuters.com Fact Check-VAERS data does not prove COVID-19 vaccine deaths exceeded 12,000
Posts sharing incorrect incident numbers reported to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) are missing context.www.reuters.com Fact check: 3,150 people were not ‘paralyzed’ after receiving COVID-19 vaccine
An article circulating on social media says a report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) indicated that “3,150 persons were paralyzed” after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. The article is missing context.www.reuters.com
Probably because it takes 14 days for the vaccine to become effective and offer protection.the CDC have a new interesting rule.. if someone were to pass away within 14 days of the Vaccine, their death is recorded as being an unvaccinated death.. so not linked to the Vaccine.
Jim/James Smith, CEO of Reuters, is also on the board of Pfizer. What do you mean by 'follow the money'?Reuters is not a reliable source for anything, you dont think it possible for the media to be bought out at all, that there are financial incentives, follow the money back, they are linked to Pfizer
Still? I dont think we have ever exchanged dialogue before have we?Still tilting at Windmills I see.
That means there is a conflict of interest in my opinion..no not everyone in an organisation is aware of what goes on at upper levels..Fact checkers is financed by Pfizer that is not independent or reliable.. what do you think the big fine was for in 2009, you dont think its at all possible that there could be any lies being told from anywhere.. I am not ignoring any information, that's just not intelligent to me at the moment, I can see and hear alot of propaganda too, you think the 24/7 promotion of the flu was normal, are you aware of the level of funding that went through our media, its massive and its fairly one-sided which I find unusual..Probably because it takes 14 days for the vaccine to become effective and offer protection.
Jim/James Smith, CEO of Reuters, is also on the board of Pfizer. What do you mean by 'follow the money'?
Do his dual roles mean that everyone working in Pfizer is compromised and every journalist in Reuters is dishonest? Between the two companies we're talking about over 100,000 people.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?