On the womans place thing, why make it gender neutral?, why not just get rid? It's Nanny state type stuff. I laugh at how most people who whinge about the Nanny State are the biggest beneficiaries in terms of social welfare and housing.
Re 2 income housing - its the reality if you want to live in Dublin, Cork, Galway. However there is no absolute decree that you must live in those 3. Or more particularly if you need social housing, should you insist on it being in the centre of Dublin? Many parts of the country have surplus housing, you can choose to avail of it if you want or you can choose to bide your time in Dublin - & your social welfare will go a lot further in the country. The country is almost at full employment, there's a good chance you could go for more liveable options if you wanted - so a lot of people need to move past the 'victimhood' they have assumed.
So while the State must do more in building social housing (all other measures are deckchairs on the Titanic), can we achieve utopian levels of everyone accommodated in social housing within Dublin City and private buyers in Dublin able to survive on 1 income?, I genuinely doubt it. For Dublin's own sake it needs other cities to be developed.
Re blasphemy - I presume we have legislation to deal with racism, hate speech, incitement to hatred - that type of thing. If so then no need of blasphemy. Also, do we really need to constitution to deal with everything?, all this stuff should be in legislation if it is needed at all. Only the most important and fundamental of issues should be in the constitution.