Up to yourself of course, but I recommend the full podcast before offering an opinion.
I understand that we are all not going to come same conclusion. A bit like that Game of Thrones series, I could not get past episode 5 of season 1, but I am reliably told it was an epic adventure for a near decade across the Western world.
The main point is, if it was just solely Morrisons opinion, you could take it with a pinch of salt. But as you mention, he was prominent in devising a political and military strategy that was supported by large tracts of an unrepentant community where he came from. It gives some substance to his perspective, in my opinion.
There is obviously the other side of that perspective, one that no doubt we are all familiar with.
I think it is important and useful for all perspectives to be heard. For instance, I am interested in why
the near silence from the Unionism that British Army soldiers are effectively immune from prosecution for murder of innocent civilians including teenage boys, save those that cheer the decision.
It's almost as if some in the community of Daniel Hegarty saw what was happening and realised that British law and order did not apply to those privileged, paid and pensionable, officers of the British Army, and took matters into their own hands. Wrong of course, but human nature being human nature, it is understandle.
For the rest of us, it has taken 50yrs for the British State to formally announce the privileged entitlement of British Army soldiers to murder its own citizens on the streets of the UK.
