"No jobs mantra suits the work-shy and welfare abuser"

No it's not. Dell would have moved anyway unless you wanted Dell to pay Irish workers the same wage as people earn in Poland. Do you really expect Ireland to compete with Eastern Europe and Asia when it comes to labour costs in manufacturing? The minimum wage should be scrapped but so should salary caps. Both are ridiculous. However, thinking it is a big problem economically is wrong. Even the IMF didn't care. They cared about flexibility in pay rates. Not the actual pay rates.

The current crisis is the result of greed and incompetence, not underpaying top executives.

If there is one thing everyone has had hammered home this time around, its that paying top wages doesn't buy competence.

I don't have a problem with salary caps especially if it encourages the overpaid incompetents in the derivatives, banking and finance sectors to move elsewhere.


ONQ.
 
Easy to point the finger, and totally irrelevant to the recovery.

Equally obvious to see that you're not working and living in Dublin on the minimum wage.

ONQ.

Ah, the old cyclical argument that because the cost of living is high the minimum wage must also be high making the cost of living even higher.

Cutting our cost base will help the recovery. The minimum wage in the UK is the equivalent of €6.50. The minimum wage in Ireland should be cut to the same. To sooth the consciences of left leaners like yourself, the typically Irish fudge should be making the lower rate only applicable to new entrants.

All costs must be cut in Ireland.
 
Cutting the minimum wage is only one element of any potential restoration of our competitiveness.

All costs have to be looked at. Utilities, rent, rates, compliance fees, professional fees...everything.

But in my honest opinion, the minimum wage is far too high and we have to start somewhere so let's cut it.

Lots of the now defunct PD mantras here, but precious little specifics about what kinds of jobs these moves will create.
 
The minimum wage isn't so great that people on it are able to get into a bidding war with the better paid to push up prices.

Equally, if you cut the minimum wage, it will simply beggar the lowest paid and won't actually reduce demand or prices overall.

To suggest that is the case is a logical impossibility.

We agree that all costs must be cut.


ONQ.
 
Lots of the now defunct PD mantras here, but precious little specifics about what kinds of jobs these moves will create.

Apparently labour costs account for 25% of the cost of a meal in a restaurant. Cutting the minimum wage should lead to reduced prices which would help tourism and domestic spending.

Wander into a shopping centre on a Sunday and take note of the number of retail units that are closed on Sunday. Why are they closed, especially given footfall on Sundays should be relatively high? Because the businesses cannot afford to pay their staff multiples of the minimum wage. Sunday premiums should be abolished...in retail there is no weekend.
 
Lots of the now defunct PD mantras here, but precious little specifics about what kinds of jobs these moves will create.


I don't see any sign that "all costs will be looked at" either.
The so-called regulator has just approved 22% gas price rise on top of a 12% ESB price rise, which is interfering with the market.
In a recession, the retailer gets squeezed if he wants to maintain market share because he's being screwed by the wholesaler and his customers cannot afford to pay more.
Suppliers of utilities treat their customers appallingly, abusing their dominant position supplying essential services to create upward only movements of prices, which affects both homes and businesses.

ONQ.
 
Apparently labour costs account for 25% of the cost of a meal in a restaurant. Cutting the minimum wage should lead to reduced prices which would help tourism and domestic spending.

Wander into a shopping centre on a Sunday and take note of the number of retail units that are closed on Sunday. Why are they closed, especially given footfall on Sundays should be relatively high? Because the businesses cannot afford to pay their staff multiples of the minimum wage. Sunday premiums should be abolished...in retail there is no weekend.

Wander into the shopping centre during the week and see if the same shops are closed.
Those that have gone have gone because they cannot afford the leases.

Please could you also post references for your figures.
I don't disagree, but it improves the debate.

ONQ.
 
Wander into the shopping centre during the week and see if the same shops are closed.
Those that have gone have gone because they cannot afford the leases.

Please could you also post references for your figures.
I don't disagree, but it improves the debate.

ONQ.

I'm talking about stores that are open Monday to Saturday.

That 25% figure comes from a Failte Ireland study which for some reason I can't reopen.

EDIT: [broken link removed]

It's actually 30%.
 
Lots of the now defunct PD mantras here, but precious little specifics about what kinds of jobs these moves will create.
Equally true of the jobs that the pension levy and VAT reduction are supposed to fund and incentivise - getting back to one of the original thread topics from the article - why reduce VAT and charge a levy on pension funds when job creation is far from clear.
 
Apparently labour costs account for 25% of the cost of a meal in a restaurant. Cutting the minimum wage should lead to reduced prices which would help tourism and domestic spending.

So we're going to reduce wages of existing staff, and use that to pay a few extra staff. No increase in GNP there - just spreading the jam a little bit thinner, which will largely benefit the owners of the business.
 
Good to get some clarity that this not about creating new jobs, but is in fact about lowering wages in existing jobs.


Lowering wages in existing jobs will mean profits for companies which means more expansion which means more jobs. Interestingly the minimum wage was introduced into Ireland in 2000, just about the time when we reached the top/end of our real boom here so we did quite well without it. In fact, from an economic perspective, what benefits did the minimum wage result in?

As far as I can see, it is a false premise. What kinds of businesses and organisations who operate in the sub-minimum wage sector will be competing for international business?

Any business who exports. Existing companies will expand here if costs are cheaper and new ones will locate....it's very basic economics.


Finally, I think it's rather pathetic that you slur mine and other arguements by comparing them to the PDs...our views have been around a lot longer than the PDs. Speaking for myself, I don't want anyone to be worse off, in fact wages will fall all over the private sector including my own but I see this as necessary to attract new business to get so many off the dole.

Given that so many are protected by the Croke Park Agreement, alas, I fear that we'll face more taxes rather than cuts in wages and numbers.
 
So we're going to reduce wages of existing staff, and use that to pay a few extra staff. No increase in GNP there - just spreading the jam a little bit thinner, which will largely benefit the owners of the business.

More people will be working, gaining experience, they will use that experience to progress and increase their earnings.

Lower welfare costs require lower taxes resulting in higher disposable income in the economy.

If a portion of the jobs have an export focus there will be a knock on of more ancillary jobs. More staff on the factory floor require more canteen staff, cleaners etc. Based on increased competitiveness, these will be new jobs.
 
We are a small island off the coast of a larger island off the coast of Europe. I business based in Stuttgart is within 2 hours drive of 20 million people. We are at a massive disadvantage due to our location, our lack of industrial infrastructure and scale and our lack of pedigree in world-class manufacturing. German = quality, Swiss= quality, Japanese = quality and now Korean = quality. We’ve no Nokia, no Philips, no Siemens, no Samsung.
In order for us to compete we have to be better and cheaper than our high-end competition. Were like a women working in an engineering firm in the 1970’s; we have to be better to overcome bias perception.
At the moment many Irish businesses are losing money, be the in export manufacturing or services or in domestic retail. The notion that employers would be able to harvest vast profits and bugger off to a tropical island if wages were cut is nonsense. This is about keeping businesses viable (or making them viable again).

As for being against cuts in wages because it would just “spread the jam a little thinner”, I thought that was what socialism was all about; spreading around what’s there so that everyone can get some.
 
Lowering wages in existing jobs will mean profits for companies which means more expansion which means more jobs.
Or else it will mean more profits for business owners which are not reinvested, or else it will mean more profits for business owners which are moved or reinvested offshore. But you're also ignoring the other side of the coin - lowered wages means less spending, which means less retail jobs and less tax income.

Any business who exports. Existing companies will expand here if costs are cheaper and new ones will locate....it's very basic economics.
And again, for the Nth time, could you give some examples of export businesses that are paying minimum wage?

Finally, I think it's rather pathetic that you slur mine and other arguements by comparing them to the PDs...our views have been around a lot longer than the PDs.
The relevance is to the author of the original article.

More people will be working, gaining experience, they will use that experience to progress and increase their earnings.
And maybe if things go really well, and they work really hard, they could just possible progress and increase their earnings right back to the current minimum wage level? It's the American dream come to Ireland - where you need 2 or 3 low paid jobs just to survive.

Lower welfare costs require lower taxes resulting in higher disposable income in the economy.
There may indeed be some benefit here, though it is probably more to do with debt repayment than higher disposable income imho.
If a portion of the jobs have an export focus there will be a knock on of more ancillary jobs. More staff on the factory floor require more canteen staff, cleaners etc. Based on increased competitiveness, these will be new jobs.
Again, I'm still in the dark as to what kind of export businesses pay minimum wage.



"If businesses can offer their services at lower prices they will win more international business.....Do you think it is otherwise?"



Would you care to expand on this?
I thought that I already had - I'm still in the dark about what kind of export businesses are paying minimum wage?
 
Or else it will mean more profits for business owners which are not reinvested, or else it will mean more profits for business owners which are moved or reinvested offshore. But you're also ignoring the other side of the coin - lowered wages means less spending, which means less retail jobs and less tax income.

More profits will result in new entrants entering the market which will create more jobs

And again, for the Nth time, could you give some examples of export businesses that are paying minimum wage?


It's not a question of which export business are paying the minimum wage, rather that the minimim wage is a floor which wages are set above. Reducing the minimum wage will have downward presure on wages.

I thought that I already had - I'm still in the dark about what kind of export businesses are paying minimum wage?

You didn't...you said "As far as I can see, it is a false premise." and then went on to ask me another question!

Finally....back to the original topic...a simple question:

Do you think that our minimim wage level and social welfare rates are deterring people from seeking employment?
 
Reducing the minimum wage will not create manufacturing jobs. It just won't. The rates of pay in German manufacturing firms are way higher our minimum wage because they are all governed by collective agreements. The rates of pay in German services sector are lower. Now, we might create a few jobs in the services sector but because much of services jobs are created by domestic demand, the impact is likely to minimal.

By all means, get rid of the minimum wage but it will not lead to some sort of economic nirvana.
 
Would you care to give some kinds of examples of the kinds of business and industries that will create new jobs (not displace existing jobs) by offering wages below the current minimum wage level?
See this is the thing about economics and the future, nobody knows. And as inconvenient as that is, absolutely nothing can be done about it. I know that there are plenty of politicians and socialists in general that believe that they can influence what is invested where and what the outcome will be. But they are all very wrong.
Hayek summed it up perfectly in this quote: "The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."

Unemployment is the result of a price mismatch between supply of and demand for jobs. I think I made a pretty good analogy in an earlier post. It doesn't matter what jobs will be created, the important thing is to balance supply and demand of work. The law of supply and demand is ubiquitous in economics, just like gravity in the world of physics.

I'll repeat the question - maybe instead of repeating the tired old mantras of the defunct PDs, you could give some kinds of examples of the kinds of business and industries that will create new jobs (not displace existing jobs) by offering wages below the current minimum wage level?
Please don't compare the comments that oppose your views to the PDs. Under the PDs government grew hugely, minimum wage went up massively, welfare entitlements went up, regulations increased across the board. All these things are the exact opposite of free market and classical liberal economics.

So we're going to reduce wages of existing staff, and use that to pay a few extra staff. No increase in GNP there - just spreading the jam a little bit thinner, which will largely benefit the owners of the business.

Here's another lesson in basic economics for you. Increased profits means increased capital available for reinvestment, which results in increased employment. Increased profits also means increased competition from other "greedy" capitalists who want a piece of the pie, which means increased employment. Increased competition drives down prices, which increases demand further.

Complainer said:
Or else it will mean more profits for business owners which are not reinvested, or else it will mean more profits for business owners which are moved or reinvested offshore.
And another little economic reality check that may not suit you. When profits start rising investment starts to flow in not out. When investment flows in an economy improves. The reason investment and capital is not flowing into Ireland is because investors do not see profits. When they do see profits their greed radar will focus on Ireland again.

Complainer said:
But you're also ignoring the other side of the coin - lowered wages means less spending, which means less retail jobs and less tax income.
And this completely ignores what actually happens. Let's say that wages are reduced and more jobs created resulting in the same amount of total wages. First of all this would not lower spending but keep it level. But for arguments sake let's say that spending did go down resulting in a lower revenue to retail businesses. Because now there are less people on welfare the rate of taxation can be lowered so the net effect on the economy is zero.
 
And maybe if things go really well, and they work really hard, they could just possible progress and increase their earnings right back to the current minimum wage level? It's the American dream come to Ireland - where you need 2 or 3 low paid jobs just to survive.

A person who has no job now has better prospects for the future by working for €7 an hour now than by staying on welfare. Why do you assume that people would only progress to the min wage, surely with opportunities many people have the potential to reach great heights. The more people that get a chance the better.

There may indeed be some benefit here, though it is probably more to do with debt repayment than higher disposable income imho.
Your point about debt repayments is valid but I am also thinking of the many people in their early twenties who don't have the large debts but have not had an opportunity to enter the workforce.

Again, I'm still in the dark as to what kind of export businesses pay minimum wage.

It is not about targeting only those on min wage, it is about all wage levels which are relative to a minimum wage. In the food sector I would expect that there are many min / low pay jobs that are export focused. Top 15 export food companies:

1. Kerry Group
2. ARYZTA
3. THE IRISH DAIRY BOARD CO-OP
4. GLANBIA PLC
5. KELLOGG EUROPEAN TRADING
6. DAWN MEATS EXPORTS LTD
7. ORIGIN ENTERPRISES PLC
8. IRISH FOOD PROCESSORS
9. DIAGEO
10. ATLANTIC (Coca Cola) INDUSTRIES
11. PEPSI-COLA MANUFACTURING
12. KEPAK GROUP
13. R & A BAILEY & CO
14. GREEN ISLE FOODS LTD
15. GREENCORE GROUP PLC
 
And maybe if things go really well, and they work really hard, they could just possible progress and increase their earnings right back to the current minimum wage level? It's the American dream come to Ireland - where you need 2 or 3 low paid jobs just to survive.

Maybe they could start their own business? Maybe they could hire people at a rate that makes sense to expand their own business? But why bother when the social welfare rates are so high compared to the minimum wage?
 
Back
Top