World Economic Forum - The Great Reset

WolfeTone

Registered User
Messages
1,083
Summary

The world is at a historic crossroads, as economies everywhere attempt to pull themselves out of a COVID-19-induced hiatus. The damage inflicted has been horrific in terms of lives taken and livelihoods lost. However, it also presents an opportunity to rebuild in a more inclusive and responsible way. Coronavirus-related lockdowns provided a glimpse of what is possible in terms of limiting pollution, and the pandemic's human toll illustrated what can happen when healthcare systems and social safety nets are neglected. Now, it is up to leaders in the private and public sectors to seize the moment and help create a more equitable and sustainable society.

The Great Reset

Harnessing the Fourth Industrial Revolution

Technology can be a tool for positive change as we rebuild after the pandemic
As the COVID-19 pandemic spread it triggered a wave of potentially dangerous misinformation online. It also underlined both the potential benefits - and the potential privacy concerns - related to technologies capable of tracking a person’s location. Around the world, the technologies powering the Fourth Industrial Revolution played both positive and negative roles as countries grappled with one of the gravest global health crises in modern history.

International Taxation of Individuals

Globalization and the tax avoidance industry have enabled increasingly illicit behaviour
Recent public disclosures have cast new light on the old saying, “the poor evade, the rich avoid.” By using information on the wealth hidden in tax havens by the 0.01% wealthiest individuals in the world (uncovered thanks to the Panama Papers and Swiss Leaks disclosures, and via various tax amnesty programs), economists from the University of California, Berkeley, have been able to estimate the total amount of taxes evaded globally by the ultra-rich - and the findings are astounding. One quarter of all taxes owed by the wealthiest 0.01% are never paid, compared with tax evasion rates that are as low as 3% amongst taxpayers in the bottom 90% of the wealth distribution.

In order to curb this phenomenon, tax authorities need access to more information about foreign bank accounts, ideally through automatic exchange-of-information agreements (recent developments such as the US’s Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act are evidence that this is starting to happen). Above and beyond the simple exchange of information, we need to create a global wealth registry that records the beneficial owners of the world’s assets.

Mobility

Mobility is a fundamental human need, and an essential enabler of prosperity. But the current mobility paradigm is not sustainable; car travel causes millions of deaths every year, a significant amount of greenhouse gas emissions are transport-related, and congestion causes heavy financial losses. There is hope on the horizon, however - the global mobility system is in the early stages of massive transformation, as new technologies enable innovative related businesses, and as policy-makers seek out ways to foster mobility that is smarter, cleaner, and more inclusive.
 
Last edited:
In order to curb this phenomenon, tax authorities need access to more information about foreign bank accounts, ideally through automatic exchange-of-information agreements (recent developments such as the US’s Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act are evidence that this is starting to happen). Above and beyond the simple exchange of information, we need to create a global wealth registry that records the beneficial owners of the world’s assets.
The EU tried that and it resulted in the ruling class in the biggest tax haven in the world, which is also possibly the most corrupt country in the world, to use lies, xenophobia and racism to convince the citizens of that country to vote to leave the EU.
 
The EU tried that and it resulted in the ruling class in the biggest tax haven in the world, which is also possibly the most corrupt country in the world, to use lies, xenophobia and racism to convince the citizens of that country to vote to leave the EU.

I have no doubt that the prospect of such a global arrangement is remote, nevertheless, that it is on the agenda of WEF indicates that some influential people do have this concept in their sights.
 
The coronavirus has halted globalisation in its tracks, it showed how vulnerable the globalisation of manufacturing was and how dependant it was on Chinese manufacturing with many countries running out of key components and products when China closed down. The ultimate benchmark of globalisation is airline traffic, which has been increasing dramatically since the 1990s until this year then a cliff edge fall. If airline traffic does not recover to its pre Covid levels which many are predicting and even cheer leading well then it follows that globalisation has reversed . Indeed the World health organization has been making dire predictions about the increase in global poverty as a result of lockdowns and people not travelling and not buying products and holidays from poorer countries.
 
Indeed @joe sod.

I think the underlying premise of the WEF is we cannot go back to the ways things were. We will be waiting for outbreak of the next strain of Covid, or some other virus?
The environment is being destroyed and tax avoidance is driving inequality, lack of access to health and education.

So what to do?
 
Last edited:
The coronavirus has halted globalisation in its tracks, it showed how vulnerable the globalisation of manufacturing was and how dependant it was on Chinese manufacturing with many countries running out of key components and products when China closed down. The ultimate benchmark of globalisation is airline traffic, which has been increasing dramatically since the 1990s until this year then a cliff edge fall. If airline traffic does not recover to its pre Covid levels which many are predicting and even cheer leading well then it follows that globalisation has reversed . Indeed the World health organization has been making dire predictions about the increase in global poverty as a result of lockdowns and people not travelling and not buying products and holidays from poorer countries.
Yes, that is very concerning as Globalisation has caused a massive redistribution of wealth from the rich to the poor. It has done more in 40 years to alleviate poverty than 100 years of wars, revolution and socialism.
 
Yes, that is very concerning as Globalisation has caused a massive redistribution of wealth from the rich to the poor. It has done more in 40 years to alleviate poverty than 100 years of wars, revolution and socialism.

The challenge is to do it in an sustainable manner. The last 40yrs has also seen the greatest increase in carbon emissions that threatens to destablise the planets eco system and with it, drive tens, if not hundreds, of millions of people into poverty. And over the last decade at least we are seeing the global transmission of new viruses emerge, Sars, Swine Flu and now Covid19 which is putting the brakes on globalisation.
So globalisation good, but globalisation as it is currently implemented is unsustainable.
 
The challenge is to do it in an sustainable manner. The last 40yrs has also seen the greatest increase in carbon emissions that threatens to destablise the planets eco system and with it, drive tens, if not hundreds, of millions of people into poverty. And over the last decade at least we are seeing the global transmission of new viruses emerge, Sars, Swine Flu and now Covid19 which is putting the brakes on globalisation.
So globalisation good, but globalisation as it is currently implemented is unsustainable.
I agree but the main reason for the damage to the climate is all those people not dying of diseases and starvation having their own kids and getting a bit better off and starting to pollute like we do.

Globalisation isn’t the problem. Our energy usage and consumption is the problem. Lots of that pollution in China and India and across South East Asia is because of things we consume. Our high environmental standards in the EU mean we produce far less food than we could and so much of our food is produced in countries which are not in the Northern Temperate Zone and so cause far more environmental damage that it would if it was produced here. Globalisation isn’t the problem. Capitalism isn’t the problem. Our myopic policies and political decisions within a globalised planet are the problem.
 
Globalisation isn’t the problem. Capitalism isn’t the problem. Our myopic policies and political decisions within a globalised planet are the problem.


I have picked three subjects, above, just as sample. But if there is specific areas, such as policies decisions that are a detriment to the well-being of the global ecology and economy then it may be interesting to tag it to what WEF is saying about it?
 
I agree but the main reason for the damage to the climate is all those people not dying of diseases and starvation having their own kids and getting a bit better off and starting to pollute like we do.
In 1900 the world population was 1.5 billion now it is 8 billion, you mentioned that people are not starving to death now like they were because of the much more plentiful supply of food. However you have to give proper credit to the factors that caused this, the original "green revolution" and the massive increase in yields and the machinery and technology developed to harvest this food . In other words our ability to grow and harvest large quantities of food and distribute this to the large cities which grew as a result was fundamentally because of our successful exploitation of fossil fuels and especially oil.
If there was no oil there would have been no industrial revolution, no agricultural revolution, no big cities and no high tech revolution of today. As of 2019 fossil fuels still represent 84% of our total energy consumption, our total energy consumption is still increasing dramatically and yes renewables are taking a growing proportion of this but fossil fuel consumption is still increasing. Fossil fuels are basically millions of years of sunshine condensed and released in one go that is why it is so difficult to find a replacement , so that diesel truck or tractor is being powered by millions of years of sunshine that shone when the dinosaurs were here. If Tesla could invent a solar panel that harvested light from the dinosaur era well then we would be onto something, thats the difficulty we are facing trying to transition from oil.
 
I agree with the gist all of that, though the agricultural revolution happened before the industrial revolution and before the industrialised use of coal.
 
However, it also presents an opportunity to rebuild in a more inclusive and responsible way. ...


...Now, it is up to leaders in the private and public sectors to seize the moment and help create a more equitable and sustainable society.

The job of leaders in the private sector is to make money by catering to the wants of consumers.

The job of leaders in the public sector is to implement the views of the voters.

To effect change consumers and voters must reward and select leaders who will deliver change. Ultimately it is not up to the leaders, its up to the people.
 
Eddie Hobbs was on the Mick Clifford podcast in the last few days waffling on about this as if it's an imminent threat to the world economic system rather than just some obscure, wishy-washy concept from the ould lad that founded the WEF. He was parroting all the usual conspiracy language around this document and it is attracting the flat-earther types in the comments as expected. "The Great Reset" seems to have been hijacked and is now bound up with all these NWO/Bill Gates conspiracies. The podcast presenter didn't really seem to know anything about the document itself or the ideas within it and just allowed Eddie to present it as some sort of dystopian elitist plot unchallenged. Mad stuff really.

 
Harnessing the Fourth Industrial Revolution

I think that was the theme to the 2016 Davos talking shop so obviously its still on their to do list

then 2008 we had "The Power of Collaborative Innovation" as the theme however by

2018 it was "Creating a Shared Future in a Fractured World"

so obviously the Collaborative Innovation of 2008 didn't happen as the Fractured World was still on the Davos to do list by 2018 and last week the Chinese refused the World Health Organisation entry visas to find out the source of the corona virus after months of negotiations, therefore the Collaborative Innovation of 2008 is still on the to do list. Maybe they will put that back on for 2022 especially as it will be back in Switzerland and the head honchos can go skiing again just like the good ol days once Greta :mad:doesn't turn up again.
 
After the devastation to many parts of the global economy what many normal people want now is a "reset" of their lives back to some semblance of normality before the corona. The last thing they want is some hifalutin big worded diatribe from out of touch CEOs, bankers and bureacrats
 
After the devastation to many parts of the global economy what many normal people want now is a "reset" of their lives back to some semblance of normality before the corona. The last thing they want is some hifalutin big worded diatribe from out of touch CEOs, bankers and bureacrats

You tell 'em Joe. Where's my pitchfork.
 
Putin gave a very interesting interview at the World economic forum. He more or less reached out to Europe saying Russia is a european country both culturally and historically, he said we need to discard the phobias of the past century, love can't be one way it needs to be also returned. He said French leaders of the past talked about Europe stretching from Lisbon to the Urals but why stop at the Urals why not Vladivostok? Putin before said that Russia was both a European and Asian country whereas now he says its European . Whats the reason for this ? is he trying to check the power of China by saying that Russia could join up more closely with Europe if China ever gets any notions about Eastern Russia.
Maybe also the return of the US to isolationism under Trump and the possible withdrawal of the US from NATO, of course Biden has taken that off the agenda for now but what if Biden is just an abberration in terms of foreign policy and that actually Trump is really correct with regards to US involvement in NATO. I think Russia now feels more threatened by Chinese economic and military power and maybe wants to form alliances both economically and militarily with Europe.
 
All this Russiaphobia being propagated in the West is a concern. I think it makes absolute sense to develop diplomatic relations with Russia, notwithstanding concerns about Putins authoritarianism.

I think Clare Daly MEP has her finger on the pulse over EU/Russia relations.


 
Alot of opposition to this whole thing "The Great Reset", using the corona virus lockdown to try and change things to suit unelected elite bodies. There is a worrying trend of these unelected and unanswerable groups like the global wealth forum, the IMF, the UN and now Big Tech grabbing power for themselves and using our money to pay for their agendas cloaked in the blanket of the common good.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top