Duke of Marmalade
Registered User
- Messages
- 4,449
First, BC says he doesn't want to name the 10 because that would prejudice a trial.
Then he says it is because he doesn't know them.
Now we are told that because they are shareholders of Anglo they are bound by banking confidentiality to their customers.
Now this last is the most disingenuous of all, what happened to "whistleblowing" ala money laundering? And anyway weren't the banks forced, rightly, to disclose their offshore tax cheats?
If this was all legal and above board, and Anglo's lawyers say it was, why aren't at least some of the 10 coming out? There must be sumfin' rotten here if they prefer to let this "whodunnit?" develop an enormous head of steam which will surely explode eventually.
Then he says it is because he doesn't know them.
Now we are told that because they are shareholders of Anglo they are bound by banking confidentiality to their customers.
Now this last is the most disingenuous of all, what happened to "whistleblowing" ala money laundering? And anyway weren't the banks forced, rightly, to disclose their offshore tax cheats?
If this was all legal and above board, and Anglo's lawyers say it was, why aren't at least some of the 10 coming out? There must be sumfin' rotten here if they prefer to let this "whodunnit?" develop an enormous head of steam which will surely explode eventually.