Is there any chance we could stick to the real world for this discussion. What I actually said was "At various times due to population changes, the one TD per 30k limit was way out" and I gave you one particular example. Dublin South is due to take some space from Dun Laoghaire, as DL loses one TD this time round. Feel free to check out other constituency boundary changes or changes to number of TDs to see where the ratios have been breached.You said the one TD per 30,000 requirement was regulary breached. When?
1° Dáil Éireann shall be composed of members who represent constituencies determined by law. 2° The number of members shall from time to time be fixed by law, but the total number of members of Dáil Éireann shall not be fixed at less than one member for each thirty thousand of the population, or at more than one member for each twenty thousand of the population.
3° The ratio between the number of members to be elected at any time for each constituency and the population of each constituency, as ascertained at the last preceding census, shall, so far as it is practicable, be the same throughout the country.
Good luck trying to get the President to sign in any law if half the seats in the Dail were not filled.
An election would have to be called.
Right, so the one party that highlighted the potential risk to the State of covering irresponsible lending BEFORE the guarantee was put in place is the one you single out for 'little understanding of economics' (excluding your local hero of course). How does that make sense? I suppose you prefer the Clowenomics approach of creating pyramid schemes and praying that the bubble doesn't burst?Agree. It is amazing that so many TDs have so little understanding of the costs of leaving Anglo sink.
The Labour Party have little understanding of economics apart from Sean Sherlock.
Shame on you for not bothering to Google. From [broken link removed] (albeit 18 months old)The only way to pay for all of this is to raise taxes now and into the future. I don't believe any of the opposition parties have had the ***** to come out and actually say exactly how they would do this, what the impact on my income tax bill and on indirect taxes would be. Shame on them.
- A new 48% tax rate should be introduced for those earning over €100,000.
Shame on you for not bothering to Google. From [broken link removed] (albeit 18 months old)
Or maybe you are falling into the trap that you accuse others of falling into - blaming everyone else and not taking personal responsibility?world has changed a lot in 18 months and I'd lile to think that they would have revisited polices since then.As I said, shame on them for not getting their message across, after all, they are the ones looking for my vote, or perhaps they have a reason for not stating this too publicaly. Maybe I am becoming too cynical in my old age
we need to get on with more important things like our childrens future
Or maybe you are falling into the trap that you accuse others of falling into - blaming everyone else and not taking personal responsibility?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?