O
OhPinchy
Guest
surely this is taking it too far:
money.msn.co.uk/mymoney/n...efault.asp
...wrongly or rightly refs for the last couple of years have been giving frees for the slightest brush against a keeper and this was just another instance...its a terrible rule altogether, hang on a minute, its not even a rule, more like another unwritten code that gives benefit of doubt to defending team...so yeh there was nothin majorly wrong with the goal, but the precedent is there and if it had been allowed against the English we would never hear the end of it, but regardless of your opinion, the above link is surely taking it too far...unless its 1st April and I have'nt noticed
money.msn.co.uk/mymoney/n...efault.asp
...wrongly or rightly refs for the last couple of years have been giving frees for the slightest brush against a keeper and this was just another instance...its a terrible rule altogether, hang on a minute, its not even a rule, more like another unwritten code that gives benefit of doubt to defending team...so yeh there was nothin majorly wrong with the goal, but the precedent is there and if it had been allowed against the English we would never hear the end of it, but regardless of your opinion, the above link is surely taking it too far...unless its 1st April and I have'nt noticed