Impossible to prove negligence in such a scenario alright, however "Res Ipsa Loquitur" (The facts speak for themselves): If the item causing the leak was entirely under the control of the defendant (e.g., their washing machine), and such an incident would not normally occur without negligence, the court may presume negligence.You'll find it hard to make negligence stand up.
If i was framing my case for a smal claims court, I would rely on this as a reasonable argument.
This individual needs to be held accountable. Simply shrugging their shoulders and giving it the old not my problem mate, would be incentive enough for me to pursue.
Res ipsa loquitur - Wikipedia
The Irish courts have applied the doctrine. In Hanrahan v. Merck, Sharp & Dohme (Ireland) Ltd. [1988] ILRM 629 the supreme court held that in cases of nuisance the burden of proof could be shifted to the defendant where it would be palpably unfair for the plaintiff to have to prove something beyond their reach. The facts concerned poisoning of farm animals downwind of a chemical plant.
Big jump from small claims court to supreme court but the principle is established in Irish law.
Last edited: