Surely the cost of the bailout is different from the cost of financing the bailout?
Or are they related?
If I buy as asset for 70, and it subsequently depreciates to 40, I have made a capital loss of 30.
How I financed the 70 initial cost, by cash or borrowing, is a separate issue to the capital loss of 30?
Isn't it?
We have lost 35bn approx due to the banking crisis. We can't go back in time and change that.
We financed that cost by borrowing from various sources, and we have already repaid the most expensive sources of finance.