Brendan Burgess
Founder
- Messages
- 54,757
That's very interesting, was wondering how many of those mortgages they had. It's a pretty niche product.Speaking to someone the other day with contactsUB have no solution yet to the offsets, there are just under 5,000 of them out there, no bank is willing to set up computer programmes to run them so make of that what you will!
I was really wondering too how many of them were left around the place, I have mine a long time, can't remember exactly how long without looking up documentation as didn't switch to it on launch as we had a staff preferential rate but when that no longer made sense then I switched. Think I will actually draw down all my available facility amount for now anyway!That's very interesting, was wondering how many of those mortgages they had. It's a pretty niche product.
I doDo you think it's now or never to draw down any facility?
That is interesting alright. I'd love to know what the outstanding amount on them is, probably less than 500mil. Sounds like they need to ensure that if they did find a buyer for them they need to maintain continuity of product features (offsetting, facilitys, etc).Speaking to someone the other day with contactsUB have no solution yet to the offsets, there are just under 5,000 of them out there, no bank is willing to set up computer programmes to run them so make of that what you will!
Do you think it's now or never to draw down any facility?
Why would you?
You have a contract which they cannot change without your agreement?
Am I missing something on how these work?
Brendan
I know nothing has been announced but I don't see any other way out of it for them.
It's inevitable both KBC and Ulster will have to maintain some kind of entity for a very long time to deal with all sorts of issues.If no other party wants the hassle of that (and that is certainly understandable, IT projects are expensive, time consuming and painful) what are UBs options here? Maintain some sort of entity in this market purely to manage these mortgages?
I’m thinking that this is probably the likeliest outcome. I think some of the suggestions above will constitute breaches of contract by the bank. Dankse ran into issues when they tried to do similar things and had to reverse their course of action. Any attempt by UB to dispose of these mortgages is likely to incur a big loss for them as I don’t think any other bank will want to deal with the hassle of them unless they are being sold on at a big enough discount to make it worth their while.It's inevitable both KBC and Ulster will have to maintain some kind of entity for a very long time to deal with all sorts of issues.
For example Danske left the Irish mortgage market in (I think) 2016 but their Dublin office is still carrying out a tracker review. I wrote to them last year and got a reply back after two weeks.
So it's not at all implausible that Ulster retains a wind-down entity to deal with these offset mortgages.
it wouldn't solve the problem as I still would want the offsetting of the drawn down 120k off the overall new balance of 200k
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?