Fibbernacci
Registered User
- Messages
- 127
This. When I go to the Canaries in the middle of winter I literally consider the savings on my heating bill over 10 days.€2.4k
This. When I go to the Canaries in the middle of winter I literally consider the savings on my heating bill over 10 days.€2.4k
I get that Leo but what I'm saying is the €600 saving is a notional saving, the holiday still costs €3kMy take
Total cost of trips = €3k - €600 = €2.4k
Ah, the sunk cost fallacy!I excluded them. Generally speaking, you’ve already paid for transport and accommodation in euro before you leave, so you can calculate the cost per day of that.
Which is true as well, but they're looking at the net cost which is perfectly valid in terms of budget / spend tracking. If they choose not to go on the trips they're not up €3k but the €2.4k net cost.I get that Leo but what I'm saying is the €600 saving is a notional saving, the holiday still costs €3k
Oh this is so funny, I was thinking last night the same thing but the opposite way,If they choose not to go on the trips they're not up €3k but the €2.4k net cost.
When I calculate our holiday costs, I never include food shopping as I consider that I would also shop and eat in Ireland. Sometimes food is cheaper but despite that as we might use more convenient products, cook less and shop more often, I find that it's somewhat similar. Even here, my shopping can be quite different from one week to the other.If the €3k is the total for everything is that not the actual cost and any saving is a notional saving against what you would have spent if at home
Yes, but as it's AskAboutMoney, it does make sense to think of it in more balanced terms of the impact on the bottom line, particularly for those who work off a budget. In this case, the impact on net wealth is 2.4k, not 3.So for me the cost of a holiday is what it actually cost me to get there and what I spent while there, nothing else is factored in or out
That is the standalone cost of the holiday. For me the relative cost of the holiday is more relevant and that necessitates subtracting what I would have spent if I hadn't taken a holiday.So for me the cost of a holiday is what it actually cost me to get there and what I spent while there
But then do you also add in all the stuff that you still have to pay for at home while your on holidayFor me the relative cost of the holiday is more relevant and that necessitates subtracting what I would have spent if I hadn't taken a holiday.
No. You have to pay that whether you're on holiday or not (though Gas or Electric may be less). I just factor in what I would have spent on food, transport & social.But then do you also add in all the stuff that you still have to pay for at home while your on holiday
Nor should they. Anything you have to pay whether or not you take the holiday — rent, mortgage interest, insurance — is not relevant to identifying the true cost of the holiday. The true cost of the holiday is:elcato has said their saving €600 over the 12 weeks but I presume their not factoring in the utilities at home like BB, TV and energy that they are still paying for, which I'm guessing would eat into a fair chunk of the €600 saving