I believed the mortgage specialist when they told me that it wasn't possible to get a tracker with a 100% mortgage, unfortunately i believed that person and thought it was the same everywhere. i wanted the tracker because i thought it would be better to have your rate track ECB rather that leave to the banks to decide to alter the rate whenever they want.If they wouldn't give you a tracker why didn't you go to another bank
If they wouldn't give you a tracker why did you accept their loan
Why did you want a tracker in 2006
Do you have it in writing that you a) asked for a tracker and b) that it was refused because of the 100% mortgage
Would you have been entitled to a tracker if your loan was 90%?
Is it only since reading about Leo that this has become an issue for you?
Unfortunately i do not have it in writing that it was refused because of the 100% mortgage, that part was verbal.
My understanding was that if it was not 100% mortgage i would have been able to get a tracker mortgage.
When i found out that there were 100% tracker mortgage given out by banks, this is what made me ask the question.....why was i refused a 100% tracker mortgage when others were given the 100% tracker mortgage? Why was i treated differently to other customers?