Suri Cruise's wardrobe

L

liaconn

Registered User
Messages
531
Actor Tom Cruise's three-year-old daughter Suri reportedly has a wardrobe of designer clothes worth over €2 million.
According to The Sun newspaper, Cruise, and wife Katie Holmes, have commissioned the world's top fashion names to custom-make outfits for their toddler.
An insider said: "They really splurge on Suri." The pair's pal Victoria Beckham is also said to have commissioned designer Robert Cavalli to make a dress for Suri.

The source added: "Suri is very vocal when it comes to outfits. She's rarely seen in anything twice."


Just read the above on the RTE website. I know they have buckets of money but it still seems ridiculous. A child that age will have grown out of an outfit in 4-6 months.
 
First of all I wouldnt believe everything I read on the news.

Second - they DO have buckets of money and if they choose to waste that money on designer clothes for a child - theyre entitled to.
 
Scientologists and mates with Victoria Beckham?

I'd say designer clothes for their toddler is just the tip of the iceberg as regards ludicrous behaviour.

Of course as TS says, it's up to them - doesn't mean it's not silly though. It's the likely accompanying attitude that I would find more distasteful - that they might consider their own child as more of an ornament or fashion accessory than anything else.
 
I agree they're perfectly entitled to spend their money on anything they like and there's probably loads of examples of equally ridiculous spending. I just find it crazy though (if it's true as truthspeaker pointed out). I suppose it just jumped out at me because there's so much talk around here of paycuts and just this morning in work we were all trying to figure out what we would be able to cut back on if we have to take another one. Maybe Suri could sell a couple of playsuits and donate some money to the cause!
 
Oh its definitely crazy behaviour!!
Mind you if I had buckets of money to waste as I pleased Id probably be doing equally crazy things!!

In saying that I do think that people give Tom Cruise an unneccessarily hard time, in my opinion he is a talented, clean living, hard working, religious, family man who always has time for fans at events, is never in the media for doing any morally bad stuff, seems to be very involved in the lives of his adopted children from his previous marriage and generally comes across as very well mannered, decent and intelligent.
Even the way he handled the person who squirted water in his face at a premier was polite, he didnt lose the head - I know I would have.

The fact that the religion he supports is a bit 'out there' is no worse (to me) than someone supporting ANY religion and the fact that he is as alpha male as it gets and may have some control issues is irrelevant to me as well, his ex wife doesnt speak badly of him and his current wife has the choice of staying married to him or not (ie - his control issues dont seem serious enough to worry me, just that he likes to run the show).

I think he is a nice guy, and if he wants to spend his millions on childrens clothes or funding the church of scientology - well more power to him i say!!
 
I'd also treat this story with some scepticism, or think that there is more to the story. There was a story last year showing Katie Homles and Suri picking out truckloads of toys in a New York shop and one of magazines ranted and raved about the child getting hundreds of toys. Turns out they were being donated to a charity for Christmas and were not for Suri so you never know.
I do think money like this being spent on a child is vulgar in a time where so many people have so little but there will always be this culture with people who have money. If it's not for the kids it'll be cars for adults, swimming pools etc. I'd be pretty sure that the Cruises probably donate alot to charity too.
 
Caveat said:
Scientologists and mates with Victoria Beckham?

I'd say designer clothes for their toddler is just the tip of the iceberg as regards ludicrous behaviour.

Of course as TS says, it's up to them - doesn't mean it's not silly though. It's the likely accompanying attitude that I would find more distasteful - that they might consider their own child as more of an ornament or fashion accessory than anything else.
Click to expand...

It's all relative though, most parents seem to dress their kids for show except on a much smaller budget.
 
Her dad worships a 'supreme being' made up by some nutcase ( in the 1950's I think).
Her mum looks like a stepford wife.
I say let the girl dress up and enjoy it while she doesn't know about all the nut jobs in her extended family!:rolleyes:
 
bren1916 said:
Her dad worships a 'supreme being' made up by some nutcase ( in the 1950's I think).
Her mum looks like a stepford wife.
I say let the girl dress up and enjoy it while she doesn't know about all the nut jobs in her extended family!:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Roflol. :D
 
bren1916 said:
Her dad worships a 'supreme being' made up by some nutcase ( in the 1950's I think).
Her mum looks like a stepford wife.
I say let the girl dress up and enjoy it while she doesn't know about all the nut jobs in her extended family!:rolleyes:
Click to expand...
I understand the power of faith and its place in society, but one mans God is another mans supreme being, so when Tom Cruise gets slagged off for his beliefs, one wonders why is scientology so badly received compared to other religions?
 
MrMan said:
I understand the power of faith and its place in society, but one mans God is another mans supreme being, so when Tom Cruise gets slagged off for his beliefs, one wonders why is scientology so badly received compared to other religions?
Click to expand...

Couldnt agree more. To me his belief in Scientology is no different to a belief in Christianity, Islam, Judaism, or any other religion, mainstream or not.
 
MrMan said:
It's all relative though, most parents seem to dress their kids for show except on a much smaller budget.
Click to expand...

Indeed. Is it any more ridiculous than them the average Irish teen's obsession with AppleCrumble & Ditch?
 
Caveat said:
Do you honestly not think there is any difference?
Click to expand...

Yes there is a difference. Scientology is a young religion, its beginnings are not yet shrouded in the mists of time, in 2000 years time there wont be any difference.
 
Other big differences for me would be Scientology's cherry picking of other belief systems, the many allegations of mental abuse/corruption from former 'members', and not least, that the founder of this 'religion' was a hokey low rent Science Fiction author who seemingly chanced his arm as a self help guru and then finding success, suddenly decided that we are all descended from aliens and charged people thousand of dollars for him to tell them this.
 
Caveat said:
Other big differences for me would be Scientology's cherry picking of other belief systems, the many allegations of mental abuse/corruption from former 'members', and not least, that the founder of this 'religion' was a hokey low rent Science Fiction author who seemingly chanced his arm as a self help guru and then finding success, suddenly decided that we are all descended from aliens and charged people thousand of dollars for him to tell them this.
Click to expand...

Most religions have cherry picked from other belief systems, in Christianity most of the major feast days were chosen to 'overwrite' pagan festival days.
There are plenty of allegations of mental abuse in other religions.
The founder of Christianity claimed to be the son of god (arguably similar to an alien being except the concept of alien beings may not have been around then, was born of a virgin, turned water into wine and and came back from the dead.
 
truthseeker said:
Most religions have cherry picked from other belief systems, in Christianity most of the major feast days were chosen to 'overwrite' pagan festival days.
There are plenty of allegations of mental abuse in other religions.
The founder of Christianity claimed to be the son of god (arguably similar to an alien being except the concept of alien beings may not have been around then, was born of a virgin, turned water into wine and and came back from the dead.
Click to expand...

plus I'm sure back in the day there were people profiteering from religion and of course there was a time when you literally had to pay for your sins. Religion isn't so much the problem as man's interpretation of it and exploitation of it.
 
MrMan said:
plus I'm sure back in the day there were people profiteering from religion and of course there was a time when you literally had to pay for your sins. Religion isn't so much the problem as man's interpretation of it and exploitation of it.
Click to expand...

Agreed.
There are really 2 distinct issues, one is a simple matter of a belief system, the other is the organised religion that employs the belief system as its foundation. In some cases the organised religion doesnt ask much of its members, in others the members are expected to pay money, attend services etc...
While its perfectly acceptable that religions get money from their members (well someone has to pay to build churches and temples), its always going to be open to exploitation - as its humans and not divine beings running the earthly show as it were.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top