Yellow Belly
Registered User
- Messages
- 215
A bank had attempted to register summary judgement against me through The High Court- re debt relating to the Custom House Capital debacle. It went to The Masters Court initially and both the plaintiff (a leading Bank) and defendant (myself) lodged affidavits/reply affidavits before the court and the Bank sought to have the matter referred for full hearing however I had discovered that among other things the Bank had made a a serious error in their original (sworn) affidavit and they had to admit this in subsequent affidavits. The Master was none too impressed that they had sworn incorrect information and put this in front of the court as part of their application and also with various other aspects of their case so his order was to dismiss the case with costs awarded to me.
I now have the following queries:
I now have the following queries:
- Can the Bank re-enter the case dismissed by the Master?
- As I was representing myself (having taken legal advice seperately from a friend in the legal profession- what costs am I entitled to? There was a huge amount of time/travel etc spent preparing my case and 3 different hearings in The Masters Court but can I charge for this?
- What happens to the debt (which in itself is actually quite complex)?
- Has anyone else had a similar experience in The Masters Court or indeed in relation to Custom House Capital?