Re: .....
Surprisingly interesting thread, this. The problem is that we all (more or less) agree that the situation in Sudan is appalling and "something should be done" Those of us of a liberal/left leaning would particularly tend to subscribe to this view. BUT, the only outfit with the ability to "do something" is the good old US of A...........problem........standard liberal/left policy is that USA = bad, USA military capability = worse and USA "intervention" in foreign countries = imperialism, oppression, economic hegemony etc etc. So we can't have that then. What to do??? Scratch head and think?? Ah, got it. Eureka!! What about if there WAS a regional force capable of intervention. A militarily STRONG force totally independent of US control. Better still, under the control of all the democratic States of europe. Operating under nice European politics and values and not nasty American ones. Such a force could bring stability to many troubled regions on europes borders, the Balkans, Caucusus, North Africa. Maybe even (in time) the Middle East! It could be done. Quite straightforward. A deepening of the links between EU states. Genuine internationalism. Relinquishing outdated notions of nation state sovereignty. Would cost a fair bit but what price human life and dignity? After all, taking responsibility for one's fellow occupants of the planet requires taking responsibility for their protection. Doesn't it. All standard liberal/lefty kinda stuff.
So why the f@*& do the words EUROPEAN ARMY evoke such a hysterical response???????