According to Wikipedia:
"The academic term [in Ireland] usually lasts for a minimum of 183 days in primary schools and about 168 days in secondary schools."
This puts our school year well behind many emerging economies.
What amazes me is the number of half-days my kids get, completely unannounced, and the school expects hardworking parents to pick up the slack from them.
As for accountability, I think what Pat (sort of) showed was that teachers are virtually unaccountable.
A great teacher should be paid very well indeed, but the unions constantly kick and scream against any form of open performance related pay.
Sad for both the good teachers, and for the students of poor teachers. And, as so often in Ireland, it is the hard pressed private sector worker and the small businessman who is left to foot the bill.
Any one remember Sen Joe O'Toole and his sneering attitude towards taxpayers?
What amazes me, Roy, is that nobody picked you up on the bold print in your quote above. It's absolutely daft to suggest that any school can, at the drop of a hat, grant kids a half day without informing parents in advance. Wouldn't the school have a duty of care and have to supervise the children who weren't collected by their parents? Couldn't they be sued if anything happened to the kids on their way home before official school closing time, if parents hadn't been informed? I couldn't see any school leaving themselves open to that.
How many un-announced half days have your kids had so far this year? Sonds like they've had quite a few! I certainly wouldn't accept such carry on from my children's schools. If it did happen, I'd go straight to the board of management or the Dept. of Education. And I think I'd move them to another school.
And can you remind us about what Sen. Joe O' Toole did or said. I can't recall. I do remember the ATM machine comment and Morning Ireland having to abandon an interview with him after the interviewer couldn't stop laughing when Sen. O' Toole said that some cost saving exercise, that the Dept. of Education was engaged in, was like a car owner selling the spare wheel to buy petrol.
I haven't the link but it was reported recently that we have fallen behind in education, particularly maths and reading so having children in school and extra couple of weeks a year can only be a good thing IMO. Certainly 4 one week breaks on top of the 9 weeks summer holidays is plenty for primary schools.
The fact remains, there are many families that have both parents working compared to 20 or 30 years ago. I don't see what's wrong with reforming the school year if it benefits both children and parents.
Yes, [broken link removed] came out a few weeks ago. Apparently the Department of Education are looking at curriculum overload and thinking about a change of emphasis, in favour of maths, literacy and science.
You could say the same about all employees of private sector companies who rely on state contracts/funding so its an irrelevent argument.
I do agree that teachers can be performance reviewed. And there are some instances whereby the performance is clearly below par - such as those teachers who are frequently late for work, absent for work for frivilous reasons etc. Most schools have a couple of teachers who seem to be always out or late.
Thankfully, The Depths was never a place for sweeping statements!
Sounds good. There would be obvious difficulties with some pupils having favourite teachers and others they can't stand, but if the sample was large enough and the questions very clear it could be good.
I reckon that an awful lot of teachers will be doing 3 or 4 hours of P.E. every day, Firefly, to the detriment of theorems, Peig, Shakespeare and the conjugation of Latin verbs......... not to mention cutting back drastically on the old homework!
