yeah those applications always default on the most compatible option (FAT or FAT32 depending on age of the machine). The reason why you still had 60GB even though the new drive was 80GB is because the tool you used to format the drive was made specifically for those model PCs, which had only the 60GB hard drives as spares.
You can defintely reach the wanted result (80GB+) but you'd have to have a look at the original config first and try a couple times.
Alternatively, Im sure someone else has done it and has posted on the internet at some stage.
<nods>
I specified the FAT 32 formatting when ordering for two reasons:
(i) to allow me to run legacy applications I had used on my Windows 95 OSR2 PC, and
(ii) to ensure total deletion of sensitive client data without any alternative data streams in NTFS compromising that solution.
Worked well, the only "ghost" files and folder names that were restored by the bit-by-bit data retrieval were those I hadn't specifically wiped.
In relation to achieving the total capacity, there is a bit of a Catch-22 according to CDS.
There is a tool you can use, but it doesn't seem to be usable from a running hard drive.
It has to operate at very low level on the heads and boot sectors.
[I'm now well beyond my level of expertise, but this is how I understand it]
It seems the only way to do it is run it from another HD running as primary boot.
The original master is run as secondary or slave [the laptop can support two HDs].
That way the OS isn't formatting itself as it works, if I have this right.
No one could say whether or not this was going to result in data loss.
More importantly I had already lost a few weeks of uptime.
I left it and bought the external HD backup.
It uses the Firewire 400 port on the IBM.
It is also compatible with Win2K SP4, USB II and the FAT 32 filesystems.
Its a Western Digital MyBook if anyone's interested.
FWIW
ONQ.