proper staff mobility policies
God it's all so civil and reasonable all of a sudden![]()
The bad news is that several posters on this thread (probably without even realising it) have continued to bash the public sector on this thread. This is why (as I've explained in this post - down the end) I won't be posting my proposed solutions on AAM.
There should be proper staff mobility policies and regular reviews (at least annually) of staffing needs in different areas. These should be done objectively and, if not ruthlessly, very very firmly.
The bad news is that several posters on this thread (probably without even realising it) have continued to bash the public sector on this thread.
Bash/criticise/discuss/mention?
I think this thread should be abandoned for now and a proper new one started in the vein of what Shawady VOR & Mpsox were saying.
I'm sure they do, but I've no idea why you expect them to post them here. They should be working on them within their own organisations/networks/unions etc. Sorry this is bad news, but AAM does not run the public sector.I think the point, at least initially, is more for public sector/civil service posters to make the suggestions - not just anybody. At least some of them should have sensible informed views no?