And since when do you set the parameters. Clearly that article is insightful for anyone that hasn't considered the aspect of systemic volatility. You'll note from my initial post, it was on that basis that I started this thread.
You chose to respond to a point I made about people with a basic understanding of how Bitcoin works, you then tried to dismiss my point by talking about people who were new to Bitcoin. So I've no problem with anyone disagreeing with or challenging my views, but challenge what I said, not some other point entirely.
The headline refers to it - then she specifically says as much in the first line. We can go back and trawl through the rest of the article if you wish ...although I can't see how that is necessary.
It doesn't. The headline is: 'Bitcoin, The Dollar And Facebook's Cryptocurrency: Price Volatility Versus Systemic Volatility'. Nowhere does that even suggest whether such volatility is a good or bad thing.
The article continues in a similar vein. So again, please quote where they have said or suggested it's an issue?
In this context, it certainly does.
Context is irrelevant. You cannot conclude what my thoughts are if I have not even hinted at them.
QUOTE="tecate, post: 1617528, member: 96631"]You said that the article didn't bring anything new - yet it did (with its consideration of stability volatility). [/QUOTE]
And I stand by that, there is nothing new in there. The systemic stability they refer to is a long standing feature of Bitcoin. I have said it as an interesting (if somewhat one sided) FIAT Vs Bitcoin comparison of a feature, but it should be no surprise to anyone who is pushing Bitcoin.
Respectfully, you now agree that it is a question and don't like the nature of the question?
Subjective formatting and the correct use of roll eyes emoji's? This is getting obtuse. I suggest we focus on the actual discussion.
I was trying to have an open discussion. You chose to presuppose my view through the use of suggestive formatting, then used the roll eyes in response to your assumption. That doesn't lead to anything constructive.