BoscoTalking
Registered User
- Messages
- 321
i agree and i think it was on the late late toy show when the kid had the dolls that did all sorts but when asked which would she like to keep or like best she choose the one that did nothing.I read a report lately (sorry forget where) that said children who stayed at home with a parent did better than children that were sent to playschool. The interaction between parent and child is the best education they can have of course alot depends on how you interact and play with your child. One of my children stayed at home with me and academically he achieved more than his siblings so I definitely wouldn't send them so they would be academically ahead of their peers. I believe children aren't allowed enough free time on their own anymore just to play make up games and not always participating in organized activities.
NO as long as they do homeschool them and not just let them run wild!Is there anything to stop a parent from home schooling a child and thus keeping the child out of the state school system?
Thanks for that. I shall be using that when the time comes.NO as long as they do homeschool them and not just let them run wild!
http://www.citizensinformation.ie/c...system/home_education/?searchterm=home school
Thanks for that. I shall be using that when the time comes.
Up until second level anyways.
There are no non denominational schools in my area. If there was a school with no religious ethos in my area I would send them there.
that could be the case but then if you are not clued into the pace of the child to learn and the lenght they should take to learn something - like a trained teacher would be then it could be a very daunting undertaking. In addition you could be faced with the challenge of your child needing qualified resource teaching. I wouldthink state school should not be ruled out if its needed.They will probably learn far more in a shorter period of time with one on one attention.
Well I have checked all the local schools and they all have religious patrons and thus a religious ethos. I would prefer to home school rather can subject my children to religious teachings in state schools. From my own personal experiences I learned nothing in primary school, I mostly self taught myself.
BTW I am more than qualified to teach myself.
Well I have checked all the local schools and they all have religious patrons and thus a religious ethos. I would prefer to home school rather can subject my children to religious teachings in state schools. From my own personal experiences I learned nothing in primary school, I mostly self taught myself.
BTW I am more than qualified to teach myself.
If there was a school that did that I would send them there. If they taught religion by explaining all faiths it would be better for the children, but sadly the vast majority of state schools do not. I was even asked for baptismal certs in one school and I received application forms for the local school when Mrs Bond was not a week home with the new baby. Amazing.Im totally on board with the not wanting to subject your children to religious teachings in state schools - I feel the same. But - I would counter it by teaching a child a non religious viewpoint outside of school and allow them to understand what religion is, why I dont believe in it, why other people do, how to handle a clash of beliefs and most importantly - that they are free to make their own decision regarding religion and faith when they are old enough to do so.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?