Playschool - is it really needed?

B

BoscoTalking

Registered User
Messages
316
One thing i notice on money makeover is that often the attendance of a toddler at playschool is something that a parent will not forgo no matter how much it costs. It was not in vogue with me or any of my palls (althought we did come from families with 3/4 siblings anyway) so i find it strange that its often seen as a non-option to stop it.

I mean could informal playdates with children in the estate or the park not suffice until the child hits big school and mixes like that?
 
There is no necessity to send your kids to playschool, it's normally just a way for them to interact with other kids in a slightly more formal way than "play-dates". It does help to prepare them for school in having a little bit of an idea about structure, getting out their lunch, following orders etc. But there is no reason you can't do it with a few friends if you are all stay-at-home parents.

There is nothing they will learn there that they won't learn in school. In fact, it can mean they are a little bored in school for the 1st year as they will normally have learnth colours, numbers etc.

We did send ours to a playgroup where the emphasis was very much on play & socialising. There just didn't seem to be enough parents & kids about to set up something informally.

It would be something I would be prepared to have foregone if money was tight & not have felt guilty about - there are mother & toddler groups, activities in the library, parks, painting at home etc (which we did also!!)
 
I read a report lately (sorry forget where) that said children who stayed at home with a parent did better than children that were sent to playschool. The interaction between parent and child is the best education they can have of course alot depends on how you interact and play with your child. One of my children stayed at home with me and academically he achieved more than his siblings so I definitely wouldn't send them so they would be academically ahead of their peers. I believe children aren't allowed enough free time on their own anymore just to play make up games and not always participating in organized activities.
 
Hans said:
I read a report lately (sorry forget where) that said children who stayed at home with a parent did better than children that were sent to playschool. The interaction between parent and child is the best education they can have of course alot depends on how you interact and play with your child. One of my children stayed at home with me and academically he achieved more than his siblings so I definitely wouldn't send them so they would be academically ahead of their peers. I believe children aren't allowed enough free time on their own anymore just to play make up games and not always participating in organized activities.
Click to expand...
i agree and i think it was on the late late toy show when the kid had the dolls that did all sorts but when asked which would she like to keep or like best she choose the one that did nothing.
I don't have children myself but am interested in the reasoning why some parents feel its something that can't be done without. To me its something that if its near and convenient then fine but i wouldn't be borrowing or eating less to send them.
 
Is there anything to stop a parent from home schooling a child and thus keeping the child out of the state school system?
 
Up until second level anyways.

There are no non denominational schools in my area. If there was a school with no religious ethos in my area I would send them there.
 
bond-007 said:
Up until second level anyways.

There are no non denominational schools in my area. If there was a school with no religious ethos in my area I would send them there.
Click to expand...

They will probably learn far more in a shorter period of time with one on one attention.

Are the schools in your area run by members of the catholic church or just normal state run schools that have religious instruction class? Could you have your children opt out of religious instruction?
 
truthseeker said:
They will probably learn far more in a shorter period of time with one on one attention.
Click to expand...
that could be the case but then if you are not clued into the pace of the child to learn and the lenght they should take to learn something - like a trained teacher would be then it could be a very daunting undertaking. In addition you could be faced with the challenge of your child needing qualified resource teaching. I wouldthink state school should not be ruled out if its needed.
 
bond-007, do you have pre school children?

I think that school is more than a place of education. Children get to meet lots of different type of characters from other pupils to teachers. It also teachs a child routine and to some degree discilpline and respect. I feel school is equaly as important on a sociall level as an educational one.
 
Home schooling is well regulated. Curriculum has to be followed. DES inspectors visit and inspect regularly. Welfare & education of the child is closely monitored.

Be aware of what you take on if you go the home schooling route.
 
I am a parent of four adult children who attended play school for 2.5 hours from age 3. It was a properly run play school, by that I mean one adult to ten children. It provided creative play, such as sand/water play, painting, dressing up which helped to develop the imagination. These days I think too much TV/DVD is stifling children's imagination and they don't know how to make up their own games.The play school also provided a little of the formal education, alphabet, numbers, shapes and colours. It taught in a more structured way, social skills such as communication, sharing and caring, taking turns. It helped them to cope with leaving mum/dad for a couple of hours each day. I think my children gained a lot from their experience.

The play school experience has to be a good preparation for when they enter primary school and may be placed in a class of 30+. Forget the ministers mythical 27.????????? per class.

RANT
We are the only country in Europe who accept its alright for our 4/5 year old children to be in such large classes.
If my children were young again I would be knocking down the door of the dept of Education to honour their promise of providing smaller classes.
Me thinks its time for parent power.
 
The first year in school - Junior Infants (Low Babies in my day :)) - is just like Playschool meaning that going to Playschool is not an educational necessity.
 
I think good early years education is a real benefit to children - the theory is that it teaches children how to learn.
In the irish system the state considers infant classes as preschool - and there is no obligaton to send a child to school until their 6th birthday. Unfortunately the government doesn't put much store in the benefit of early years education - as evident from the recent closure of CECDE. There is a longitudinal study being conducted by the Geary Institute in UCD focusing on the economic benefits of preschool education. Interestingly Ireland is proposing to build the largest prison in Europe at Thornton Hall ... if we put more money into early years education perhaps we wouldn't need it????
 
Well I have checked all the local schools and they all have religious patrons and thus a religious ethos. I would prefer to home school rather can subject my children to religious teachings in state schools. From my own personal experiences I learned nothing in primary school, I mostly self taught myself.

BTW I am more than qualified to teach myself. ;)
 
Well I have checked all the local schools and they all have religious patrons and thus a religious ethos. I would prefer to home school rather can subject my children to religious teachings in state schools. From my own personal experiences I learned nothing in primary school, I mostly self taught myself.

BTW I am more than qualified to teach myself. ;)
Click to expand...

Home schooling is a personal choice, but one your kids will have to live with....so make sure you get it right!! If you have a very focused kid (at 6, few & far between:p) and you have the time and energy to make sure they follow a wide & varied curriculum and ensure they don;t miss out socially....then fine.

I think, personally, it's better to mix the two....so formal schooling and make sure they have a healthy mix of activities (play, library, music, muesums, learning games etc) and let them be kids....downtime, imaginative play etc.

I'm interested that you say you didn't learn anything in primary school, you may not have enjoyed it, but did you go onto secondary school unable to read, write, do maths etc. I do appriciate that some kids didn't/don't (to our shame) get the education they need due to dyslixia (& other learning difficulties) being missed or just seen as lazy or stupid.
 
bond-007 said:
Well I have checked all the local schools and they all have religious patrons and thus a religious ethos. I would prefer to home school rather can subject my children to religious teachings in state schools. From my own personal experiences I learned nothing in primary school, I mostly self taught myself.

BTW I am more than qualified to teach myself. ;)
Click to expand...

Im totally on board with the not wanting to subject your children to religious teachings in state schools - I feel the same. But - I would counter it by teaching a child a non religious viewpoint outside of school and allow them to understand what religion is, why I dont believe in it, why other people do, how to handle a clash of beliefs and most importantly - that they are free to make their own decision regarding religion and faith when they are old enough to do so.

Id rather allow a child the social benefits of going to mainstream school than home schooling - I know a couple of home schooled kids (same reason - religion) and the children themselves express sadness that they dont have as many friends as other kids, that they dont get to play group activities as often, that they would like to have a school uniform and the independance of being left off to school and not always being in the care of mammy or daddy etc...
 
truthseeker said:
Im totally on board with the not wanting to subject your children to religious teachings in state schools - I feel the same. But - I would counter it by teaching a child a non religious viewpoint outside of school and allow them to understand what religion is, why I dont believe in it, why other people do, how to handle a clash of beliefs and most importantly - that they are free to make their own decision regarding religion and faith when they are old enough to do so.
Click to expand...
If there was a school that did that I would send them there. If they taught religion by explaining all faiths it would be better for the children, but sadly the vast majority of state schools do not. I was even asked for baptismal certs in one school and I received application forms for the local school when Mrs Bond was not a week home with the new baby. Amazing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top