Limited company funding lifestyle

You've made a fairly massive leap there to suggest she is funding it through her company.
The belief seems to be that if they go on holiday anywhere, but post a photo or make a promo video while there, then it can be written off as a business expense. No idea if that holds up though.
 
The belief seems to be that if they go on holiday anywhere, but post a photo or make a promo video while there, then it can be written off as a business expense. No idea if that holds up though

If an influencer (dislike that term) is accompanied by other non-business related people and those costs are excluded, I don’t really understand what the problem is.

I don’t see what’s so different about a solo influencer who travels to different places to promote beauty or fashion products versus a large company that photographs or films their products in exotic locations. The scale may be different ie., a company uses professional models, photography teams, make-up and wardrobe teams, incurs travel and accommodation costs etc, whereas one influencer probably does all those jobs personally or maybe with a single assistant.

If all those advertising and promotional costs are legitimate expenses for a large business, why not for a sole trader or micro business. Unless an influencer’s place of work is specifically limited in some way by revenue rules. Or non-professional modelling activities (ie using family or friends) is prohibited.
 
Taxation of Income from Social Media and Promotional Activities
(Income Tax and Corporation Tax)
Part 04-01-22
Document created July 2025
The VAT treatment of Social Media Influencers
This document should be read in conjunction with Sections 3, 5, 19, 25, 27,28, 33, 34, 35, 35A, 36 and 71 of the VAT Consolidation Act, 2010.
Document created July 2025
 
The belief seems to be that if they go on holiday anywhere, but post a photo or make a promo video while there, then it can be written off as a business expense. No idea if that holds up though.
That is a mistaken belief. If it was like that, everyone would do it. I know lots of people who have gone abroad for conferences and stayed an extra few days. Those extra few days are at their own cost, not the business.
I don’t see what’s so different about a solo influencer who travels to different places to promote beauty or fashion products versus a large company that photographs or films their products in exotic locations.
If they are paid to go to that location and promote it, that is work. If they travel to say Thailand and do a paid promotion of a restaurant while they are there, that paid promotion is taxable. The whole trip isn't an expense. Most of the work of influencers in unpaid. Their goal is to rack up followers and then be able to get ads on their channel and get paid promotion work. There was an article about Irish influencers in the The Irish Times recently. They do alright but it's not a career and it could come to an abrupt end at any time. Ireland isn't big enough for them to scale like some of the Americans can.
 
reland isn't big enough for them to scale like some of the Americans can.
That's interesting re the expenses thing. So what do you reckon's going on with O'Connor's company I wonder? Paying herself and the husband too much like Brendan's example maybe, and that funds the lifestyle. Which is fair enough. I'll tell the wife to stick to the day job for the moment so.
 
The belief seems to be that if they go on holiday anywhere, but post a photo or make a promo video while there, then it can be written off as a business expense
That's your belief, not "the" belief.

So what do you reckon's going on with O'Connor's company I wonder? Paying herself and the husband too much like Brendan's example maybe, and that funds the lifestyle
You really know nothing about their affairs. You are implying they are doing something underhanded. You should probably drop it and talk in more general terms
 
My wife is complaining that our limited company should be funding our lifestyle
No. Don't ever do this. My father did this all his life and ended up having to work til he was 78 because of it.
 
And to be clear, I wouldn't dream of doing anything like it, but I'm a bit taken aback by how it seems all too easy to get away with, judging by that case you mentioned, and the NAMA lads of the same ilk around that time too.
Well if you owe money to a bank its probably going to be eventually written off (though they will repossess any loan securing properties), but Revenue won't, so you'll probably find that Revenue will continue to chase for its share. That's what usually finishes these off. What my Dad used to do was make drawings on the total income without deducting a percentage for revenue, so he'd end up unable to pay his tax bill in full, end up with late penalties and borrowings to catch up, and so end up losing a good chunk of profit due to late penalties and punitive interest for being late.
 
o what do you reckon's going on with O'Connor's company I wonder?
I have no idea. I don't know about her company or what she is doing. In the accounts that were published, the business had a turnover of €3.7m and a gross profit of €1.5m.

Going back to your original post, I have no idea if she is funding her lifestyle through her company. I would assume the opposite and that she is not...like every other director is not.
 
Pre-tax profits at Poco Beauty, the Irish skincare and beauty firm founded by Pippa O’Connor Ormond and Brian Ormond in 2023, were over €1 million last year.

O’Connor, who last week oversaw the brand’s launch into Selfridges in the UK, told the Business Post that the figure of €1.021 million represented a 1,680 per cent rise in profit on 2024, which was the firm’s first full year of trading.

“We have put a huge amount of work into getting to this point,” she said. “We always had ambitions to expand into the UK, and to get into the likes of Selfridges, but we thought we would maybe get there in year five. To do it in year three is amazing.”
 
Those accounts are for the financial year ending 31 October 2021. There were received in May 2026. That in itself should send alarm bells ringing. Accounts should be received within 9 months of the end of the financial year end.
Are there no rules and regulations about when company accounts are filed? With penalties for late filing?
 
And the Companies Office or whatever they call it these days, enforce the rules very stringently.
In the case at hand we are talking about end of year Oct 2021 being submitted 4 months ago. Nearly 5 years later. That doesn’t sound stringent to me.
 
No, but they will be fined or otherwise penalised for late filing. For example, a small company is exempt from an annual audit. If they file late, they lose the exemption for a period. Which is very expensive.

(I am out of this area for 15 years, but that is the way it was then. Before that, the Companies Office didn't care. Annual Returns were often years late or not filed at all with no consequences for the company.)
 

Revenues at Pippa O’Connor Ormond’s group jump 117pc to €7.75m in 12 months to end of October​

Pre-tax profits at the group which operates beauty entrepreneur Pippa O’Connor Ormond’s Poco brand last year tripled to €1.17m.

Revenues at the businesswoman’s Bopoc Holdings Ltd increased by 117pc, from €3.57m to €7.75m, in the 12 months to the end of October last, new accounts show.

The group recorded an operating profit of €1.62m last year – more than a 15-fold increase on the operating profits of €102,612 reported for 2024. Interest payments of €452,548 last year reduced the pre-tax profit level to €1.17m.
 
It turns out that she's a lot more than just a pretty face, which, fro what I've heard, is obvious to anyone who ever interacted with her. Well done Pippa. The appetite for risk and hard work has paid off.

A far cry from her company funding her lifestyle.
 
Back
Top