S
sunrock
Guest
Agree with the above. Sometimes the better team doesn`t win because the other team had more luck or the bounce of the ball or whatever.That is the drama of sport.
A touchdown would NOT have been given in American Football.
In fact I can't think of ANY other sport except rugby (league & union) which would have awarded a score
.
Only if they get Pollynesia and don't look for tweetment - parrotseatemall is the usual cure![]()
How many games are actually decided like this one in the last minute by a deliberate handball? I suspect not many, we shouldn't ask for more rule changes based on one high profile isolated occurrence. As was mentioned earlier what if it had have been in the first rather than last minute? The timing of the offence shouldn't dictate the punishment, but I doubt we'd be having this debate.
In order to bring in the rule you'd have to rely on video replays to ascertain exactly was it deliberate, was it obviously a goal? But then how do we judge that, the player could have stopped it legitimately by heading or some other means rather than using their hands, so on that basis it wasn't a black and white goal, just "goal scoring opportunity".
And then what other "cheating" do we place under this law? Goalkeeper bringing a player down and other professional fouls? How about at the other end someone diving to get a penalty? Isn't that just as bad (and more common)?
Ghana were unlucky that it happened to them and it happened when it did. But then there was a whole game before that incident for them to win it.
With a penalty the odds are in the favour of the taker, it's their advantage. Otherwise why cheer a penalty awarded in your favour nearly as much as a goal? It should have been a goal, but then as a professional, international player he should have scored the penalty. He had the advantage, he had a whole net to chose from, he had a guessing keeper, he missed, they lost.
You are just racist. Makes me sick.
You have to be a little bit anal to like NFL (I love it!)
But anyway I've never ever seen that rule used (I can't even find an example of the rule being used anywhere on the internet and examples given from college games are for things like coaches stopping a player etc etc) and in fact last year there was one game where a foul as committed in the end-zone in the last play as time elapsed and the penalty awarded was a down on the 1yd line with no time restriction on the play.
A handball in the area is already covererd in FIFA's Laws of the Game
There's also the holding/tripping or intentional grounding in the endzone rule - whereby a safety score is automatically given. You see this several times a season.
Sorry but we'll have to disagree there
Holding/tripping in the endzone are called as pass interference and result in a 1st down at the 1 yd line, not a TD
Sorry but we'll have to disagree there
Holding/tripping in the endzone are called as pass interference and result in a 1st down at the 1 yd line, not a TD
I wouldn't consider the rules covering a safety to be the same thing as awarding a goal in football. You would have to find an example of a TD being awarded for that to be the equivalent.
In your own endzone, its a safety i.e. 2pts to the opposition.
Holding/tripping in the endzone
In your own endzone, its a safety
Plus it's childish giggling at this:
and this:
That gets me moderated or called homophobic.
I can watch most sports ever invented but American football is simply beyond me!
I won't even start about the NFL position called Tight End!
As least we don't have Liam, John and Eamonn commentating on tight ends and holding in the endzone.