1eyeonthefuture
Registered User
- Messages
- 85
Yes, that was in the other charges. Agent said if there had been managemt fees that would be charged too. We saw it on citizens advice but they'll be asking a solicitor before signing anything.Property tax?
I've an apartment for rent
I've been contacted by a private company with respect of renting same for one of their managers.
I have for the past nr of years not increased the rent.
The apartment is in a rpz.
If I rent to a company am I still constrained with respect of the increase in rent I can apply given its in a rpz zone.
Thanks
the landlord provides the legal requirements and charges for anything else.
I have heard of this although I don't think it is very common. Its a good idea. If the tenants computer is stolen, it is probably not covered by the landlords insurance, why would the landlord be liable, even if it is the landlord will not be happy to make a claim. If the tenant does damage to the property they should probably be insured against this.Friend's son has to get their own insurance within 30 days and give agent a copy or lease cancelled. Never heard that before either.
The property will probably be gone by then. You will know for next time.they'll be asking a solicitor before signing anything.
They paid a booking fee and the lease is going through solicitors and not the letting agent. Very different to a few years ago.Some interesting insights here. With the introduction of the RTB and the move to more 'professional' landlords many things have changed in the letting world. Or as Bipped says
I have heard of this although I don't think it is very common. Its a good idea. If the tenants computer is stolen, it is probably not covered by the landlords insurance, why would the landlord be liable, even if it is the landlord will not be happy to make a claim. If the tenant does damage to the property they should probably be insured against this.
The property will probably be gone by then. You will know for next time.
The landlord would always have bought insurance for his property, and the tenant for his (ie contents insurance).I have heard of this although I don't think it is very common. Its a good idea. If the tenants computer is stolen, it is probably not covered by the landlords insurance, why would the landlord be liable, even if it is the landlord will not be happy to make a claim. If the tenant does damage to the property they should probably be insured against this.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?